653
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Klear@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago
[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 months ago

In this case hypothetical, say, if they sold the working goggles as a novelty. Even for most relatively safe electronics there's a long list of don'ts that often rule out normal use (let alone typical use). Infamously VR goggles sometimes cause epileptic seizures even in people susceptible to epileptic seizures.

Some judges recognize no one reads TOS or can understand the legal language. Others (such as SCOTUS) beieve the draconion terms in the TOS are enough to absolve the manufacturer of responsibility.

[-] Klear@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

WTF are you talking about?! There is no TOS because there are no end users and this is just an art piece!

[-] TheOakTree@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Uhhh... they're making it clear that this is a hypothetical, in which the goggles get sold to end-users.

Maybe try reading the words on your screen next time?

this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2024
653 points (100.0% liked)

196

16614 readers
2284 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS