44
Lemmy is a bigger echo chamber than reddit
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2024
44 points (59.3% liked)
Unpopular Opinion
6216 readers
107 users here now
Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!
How voting works:
Vote the opposite of the norm.
If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.
Guidelines:
Tag your post, if possible (not required)
- If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
- If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].
Rules:
1. NO POLITICS
Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.
2. Be civil.
Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...
Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.
5. No trolling.
This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.
Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
This you?
Uh, I see the stuff with the politics stuff but... how is their opinion without explanation of Star Trek toxic?
They're not the arbiter of Trek. They have no input on what is and is not real Trek. They can like it and not like it all they want, thats opinion. But it's pretty toxic and shitty to try and claim that because it doesn't fit with your personal views that it isn't real Star Trek.
It is indeed toxic but frankly it's more pathetic piss baby behavior than anything else.
It's a rhetorical expression that says that the subject goes against the spirit of the franchise. There's no claim of authority in there, and I don't see why you think so.
If it ain't Tomino it ain't Gundam.
If it ain't Lucas it ain't Star Wars.
If it ain't Roddenberry it ain't Trek.
Importantly if you think Kurtzman is making Trek then you misunderstand the series. Star Trek is about a future where humanity lifts itself fully out of its worst aspects. It shows us what we should aspire to be. Kurtzman just wants to make Starship Troppers without the satire.
Nice toxic gatekeeping rhetoric there.
This you? 🙂
Is it gatekeeping to say fan fiction is not canon? Kurtzman's Trek is bad fanfiction with legal cover. I could write some nonsense and slap Star Trek on it and I wouldn't be able to force you to consider it Star Trek. If I had a billion dollars and bought the rights to the name would that change your mind?
Why are you so upset? I'm not old or racist. You did look through my comments and cherry picked examples to try to smear me. I'm very liberal, but admitting that would be a big backpedal. You disagree with my opinions, so I must be evil. It's a bad sign with someone of your disposition is in a position of authority. If you wear the uniform you should strive to be worthy of it.