490
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] grue@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

> implying there's a "right way" to build an SPA.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

There are a lot of standard practices like… using a router to load the content of your SPA according to the url.

[-] grue@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What I'm saying is, there's no right way to build a thing that is inherently wrong.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You could build it with no input sanitation. That’s wrong.

[-] grue@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

Even a perfectly-built SPA is a thing that should've been a different kind of program (a native app or even something like Java Web Start) instead.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

I strongly disagree, but I respect your opinion which was no doubt formed by different experiences with web technologies than I’ve had.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Not that it’s inherently good or bad, but the heavier web apps get the more a browser represents a sort of virtualization environment that only runs one stack. I think that’s interesting.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

What do you mean only runs one stack? Like front end framework? That would be the point. But it can communicate with any backend.

[-] andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun 4 points 1 year ago

There's no one right way. Saying there are wrong ways doesn't imply the existence of one right way, though.

this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2024
490 points (94.2% liked)

Programmer Humor

32707 readers
224 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS