1366
submitted 9 months ago by FQQD@lemmy.ohaa.xyz to c/memes@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

By this logic wage theft isn't theft since the employee never had the money in their possession.

Let's exaggerate things. An indie dev sells a game for 5$ and when all things are split up they have 2$ going to them. They sell one copy but with the tracker they put into the game, they can tell that there's a million person that have played it. Their income for the work they put in is 2$, a million -1 people got to enjoy what they created through piracy. So you're telling me, no one has stolen anything from that creator?

[-] MrFunnyMoustache@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago

Wage theft is different from piracy. When you work for an employer, you are giving them hours of labour in exchange for the compensation, I have a limited amount of labour hours to use in my lifetime, whereas copying a work can be done an infinite amount of times without requiring an additional labour time to recreate it.

I'm not saying that piracy is ethical, there are many cases where it is unethical, but it is not theft.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

Right, because content appears out of thin air.

[-] MrFunnyMoustache@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago

I'm not saying that piracy is ethical, but it isn't theft.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago

From the point of view of the person that should be compensated in order for you to have access to the content, it absolutely is.

[-] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social -1 points 9 months ago

in wage theft, there is an agreement about getting paid, and the employer fraudulently does not pay that. I have no such agreement with ubisoft or blizzard.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago

Ok, but you acquiring content through piracy also is fraud and also makes you acquire something someone worked for without compensating them when the agreement they had with society in general was that they would make their creation available in exchange for money.

But hey, social contract, who needs that? 🤷

[-] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social -1 points 9 months ago

>acquiring content through piracy also is fraud

letting someone share a song with you is not fraud

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works -1 points 9 months ago

It is if the person sharing it isn't the original creator, they do it in a way that makes it so you're now in possession of the content and they do it without the creator's approval.

You guys are so good at mental gymnastics, you should use some of that energy to understand laws and to think about more than your self interest.

this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
1366 points (95.7% liked)

memes

10412 readers
886 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS