552
submitted 1 year ago by zencat@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] drmoose@lemmy.world 54 points 1 year ago

Don't waste tax money on this. If some rich idiots want to unalive themselves in a can to see some garbage at the bottom of the ocean - let them.

[-] Shard@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

We've already wasted money on them.

Who do you think paid the coast guards and navies of the multiple nationals that conducted the deep sea search for Titan?

Hint: Tax payers.

[-] jkmooney@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

I don't know about the others, but Coast Guard gets paid regardless. These events justify their budget. It wasn't an "extra cost" to the taxpayers.

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

....please leave 'unalive' on places like tik tok.

[-] drmoose@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I was using it satirically and I honestly think that's where this word is going. I find it fascinating though - it's absolutely meaningless but it also sounds safe and incredibly artificial. It's full of these paradoxical features that make this word really fun. I'd invest meme points into it tbh.

[-] Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

It's too late man it's now apart of the modern language. Insert Abe Simpson "I used to be hip.." meme.

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It really only is, for the most part, on places like tik tok and youtube where the word 'dead' is banned. And it occasionally slips out into normal society but....just...no.

[-] drmoose@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Contrary to popular belief the word "dead" is not banned on tiktok or youtube. Do people really think that the censor can be tricked by a synonym a 5 yeard old could come up with?

Real argument is to protect people with trauma as seeing "dead" can be a trigger but even then it doesn't make much sense as it's the same word - just spelled differently. The only way this would work if we come up with new word for "death" every few months before our brains re-asocciate the synonyms but that's absurdly impractical and impossible to implement. I do think it's an interesting language phenomena tho and is fun to explore.

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Now that I look yeah..your right. I fell for interwebs bullshit. But completely agree on you about the constant changing of words. And going going back to the original though....if you are so triggered by the word dead/death...im sorry but you just need to learn to live with that. Society cant abandon such incredibly basic words because of people like that.

[-] Comment105@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I don't know, but to me "suicide" and "kill" seem like the words that would've been banned. Not "dead".

[-] Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

I think the slippage is going to increase. It's a full word not like "LOL", people will say it IRL.

[-] Ryumast3r@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I've never heard someone say it irl yet.

Until then

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

like 8 years ago i worked with this girl who would fucking say hashtag. like someone would say something really crazy and she would be like "hashtag really?"

I.....really hated her....

[-] Platomus@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I teach middle school. During the school year, I heard it two dozen times daily.

It's getting tiresome already.

[-] Carighan@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

I'll be honest, I don't think that's a sensible approach. Yes, it's billionaires offing themselves, sure. But regulations are quite important, in particular in sensible and critical areas like this.

If they also protect some billionaires that's an unfortunate side effect, but overall these regulations would be very good to have. The rise of venture capitalist attitude outside of IT is only going to get worse, so the sooner we can establish rules against that the better.

[-] drmoose@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Could you expand on why? Surely there must be more important areas to spend resource to regulate than protecting some rich people hobbie that only few people per year partake in. It would cost millions of dollars to regulate something like this effectively. The only argument I can think off is that it could cost less to regulate than to "save and rescue" these idiots but save and rescue is not a pro bono service for the most part either. They or their insurance will have to cover the costs of this.

[-] Silverstrings@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago

Human life has value, even when they're people you don't like.

[-] drmoose@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

dunno man the whole thing is a bit absurd. At the same time literally over 400 people drowned trying to escape poverty. It's really hard to care for this particular human value when there's this massive injustice. Reality is we don't have infinite resources and attention - we should direct it more efficiently than this.

[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I was this close to agreeing with you and then I remembered there was a kid on that sub, and now I’m thinking this was a really shitty thing to say.

[-] jkmooney@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

A kid and a researcher who made regular trips to document the flora growing on the site.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

Technically an adult. But yeah, he's the one victim I feel sorry for.

this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
552 points (95.1% liked)

World News

39005 readers
1006 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS