125
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by thenexusofprivacy@lemmy.sdf.org to c/technology@lemmy.world

Here's how EFF desribes the situation in You Can Help Stop These Bad Internet Bills

"Red alert! For the last six months, EFF, our supporters, and dozens of other groups have been sounding the alarm about several #BadInternetBills that have been put forward in Congress.We’ve made it clear that these bills are terrible ideas, but Congress is now considering packaging them together—possibly into must-pass legislation. I’m asking you to join us, ACLU, Fight for the Future, and other digital rights defenders in a week of action to protect the internet."

Can the fediverse help? The fediverse has some potential advantages for activism on topics like privacy, digital rights, and LGBTQIA2S+ issues. So it’s worth experimenting, and the July 20-28 week of action on Bad Internet Bills is a great opportunity – to learn, and hopefully to have an impact as well.

Here's four easy ways to help:

  1. Upvote and boost posts in !bad_internet_bills@lemmy.sdf.org -- and cross-post them to other communities and magazines where they're on-topic
  2. On Mastodon, boost posts on the #BadInternetBills and #KOSA hashtags
  3. Get the word out on other social networks too
  4. If you live in the US, contact your legislators using Fight for the Future’s https://www.badinternetbills.com/
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] db2@lemmy.one 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think the A is for asexual.. like why tf would someone not interested in sexuality care. At a certain point it's just someone wanting attention and I think we passed it a few characters ago. Before you, gentle reader, get upset see it for yourself.. these come from Google search, obvious joke ones were ignored:

LGBT
LGBTQ
LGBTQ+ <- this is literally all inclusive, no need to go further
LGBTQ2 ("two spirit".. aka furries)
LGBTQIA+ (longest "official" acronym)
LGBTQIA2S+
LGBTQIAAP+
LGBTQIAGNC
LGBTQQIP2SAA
LGBTIQCAPGNGFNBA+

If that doesn't make it obvious I'll leave you with a quote from Peter Tatchell:

It’s great to be inclusive, but the new alphabet soup is a confusing and alienating mess — made even worse when people get into spats over missing initials or the inclusion of initials they disagree with. The longest I’ve ever seen is LGBTIQCAPGNGFNBA. This is absurd. It makes us a laughing stock and devalues serious issues around sexuality and gender.

[-] spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yo just so you know two spirit has nothing to do with furries. It usually refers to gender nonconforming traditions in indigenous american communities and has largely come into favor in Canada as part of recent campaigns to recognize tribal communities and their histories. These movements have obviously existed for a long time but the revelations about atrocities committed at residential schools seems to have really pushed them into the mainstream.

Otherwise, I think you're thinking of "otherkin" who are not generally included under the LGBTQ umbrella, but are frequently brought up to discredit queer progress as a movement.

[-] GizmoLion@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Even without that it's not about furries, they're thinking of therians. Furries just think anthro animals look cute, not that they're an animal in a human suit.

[-] db2@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

edit: this wasn't an intended reply, I was just reading and suddenly here this comment was blank 🤷 didn't want to leave it blank or delete it so it says "deleted by creator" and then everyone wonders why

[-] another_lemming@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

This came to a logical problem of naming a coalition by several group names' initials. And a very loose one at that. I felt the same about the flag updates.

It is a conclusion to what they stand for and why they are created – to get united under one banner to be seen – but at the same time it counters that in how it is disunited in these exact banners, also to be seen and recognized but individually. And a rainbow flag, iirc, wasn't meant to mean something by each colour in it, lol.

I feel like switching to the name and a flag that don't include that self-expansion and would just stay the same would be better – but then I catch myself realizing it is nothing other than creating another acronym\flag and asking to be argued by those who promoted these expansion for I deny their effort to gain visibility.

Shit's a mess.

[-] Sir_Simon_Spamalot@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Wouldn't we want to have it as easy to pronounce/write/remember as possible? I feel like even the people involved are not taking this seriously by making it longer and longer. It surely looks like more like a joke that way.

[-] db2@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago

It's different with nearly anyone you ask too, it's not like there's some standardization of the long ones. It's literally "whatever the fuck I just thought up and you're intolerant if you don't respect it" happening. Which brings us right back to it being attention seeking.

[-] Sir_Simon_Spamalot@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Exactly. How can people take them seriously this way? Well, outside their own echo chamber, of course.

[-] golamas1999@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Instead of people fighting over letters maybe Pride Community.

[-] Ryantific_theory@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

From poking around, it seems like GSM (Gender and Sexual Minorities) is the general successor to LGBTQ and all assorted acronyms. Obviously not as popular but it at least has everyone baked into it and doesn't have any charged language, given the ongoing debate over whether queer has been reclaimed as a word or remains a slur.

Though, immediately after discovering it I did see people adding an R to make it GRSM (Gender, Romantic, and Sexual Minorities), which in theory covers every possible member of the LGBTQ+ family.

[-] fearout@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, I think that at this point there should just be an established term, not an ever-expanding acronym. Like an actual pronounceable word. Is there one besides "queer"? Similar to something-divergent, for example? Like neurodivergent/neurotypical, which became more well-known in recent years. I kinda like those.

this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
125 points (95.6% liked)

Technology

59259 readers
1301 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS