80
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

People very quickly forget things like this that Cons do.

The Con party of today is not like older ones. I'm in my 40's, and I'm used to a Nationalistic, yea-Canada Conservative party. What I am not used to is this:

image

And that's from two years ago. The man who insulted our country, who is against all the things we favourably compare ourselves against Americans with (our socialized Healthcare, our lack of need to arm ourselves to go for a walk, etc), and they're giving him the nod (Also the rape, the misogyny, insulting someone for their disability, the general incompetence, etc). Look at those numbers, 44% of Cons want Trump in power again.

Conservative voters should really be looking in the mirror to see what they want to be: Right-of-Centre economists, or Right-Wing boot-lickers. It seems for now they've chosen the later.

[-] folkrav@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Modern Canadian conservatives aren’t the tame fiscal conservatives we used to have indeed. This violent steering of the right wing towards social conservatism is worrying as fuck, and should be for anyone but hard traditionalists. It’s insane to see anybody who cares about Canada support Trump in any way with how he fucked us over and over.

[-] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago

Fiscal conservatism, in the strictest sense, has always been a means of conserving the favored hierarchies. We don't fund social programs, and as a result we maintain the rich/poor dynamic for example. This definition has nothing to do with prudent effective spending, I think.

What we think of as traditional Canadian fiscal conservatism is more correctly prudent fiscal liberalism. A willingness to engage in the use of fiscally measures for social gain so long as the funding is effective.

It's a shame that fiscal conservatism has somehow become synonymous with wanting to spend money wisely.

[-] folkrav@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh, you don’t have to convince me of their objectives. They just used to be less… upfront about it, not so long ago.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
80 points (93.5% liked)

Canada

10027 readers
1237 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS