1328
Tr(rule)am (midwest.social)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] foyrkopp@lemmy.world 146 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Depending on your definition, this actually is not peak performance.

Subways are.

Obviously, the tunnels are absurdly expensive, but nothing moves as many people as quickly around a city as a subway.

They're also extremely reliable, meaning people are even more likely to actually use them, and their above-ground footprint is essentially zero.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 95 points 9 months ago

Subways are for mobility (moving large numbers of people rapidly); trams are for access (getting you close to your destination). They complement each other and a well-designed city would have both.

[-] InfiniteStruggle@sh.itjust.works 21 points 9 months ago

STOP I can only get so erect

You're going to make me write a cute green-urbania fiction of my self-insert walking around a beautiful city with parks everywhere and using the sub-rails to go far distances and then get on cute retro san francisco style over land trams to make my way to walk-only brick roads and then walk to some book store, the corners piled high with books, with books stacked outside the store under a cloth awning, owned by a wise old man of unclear nationality who spends his days reading the books he sells, who knows me well enough to offer a glass of tea.

[-] rmuk@feddit.uk 5 points 9 months ago
load more comments (51 replies)
this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
1328 points (100.0% liked)

196

16542 readers
2087 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS