282
submitted 9 months ago by NightOwl@lemmy.ca to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 146 points 9 months ago

Carroll, the woman’s attorney, said she had been given protected whistleblower status before speaking with Congress. But those familiar with the Whistleblower Protection Act cautioned that such protections can be limited, especially at the CIA.

Tom Devine, a longtime whistleblower rights advocate who is legal director for the Government Accountability Project, said CIA employees don’t have the same rights as other federal employees because of national security concerns.

“You can blow the whistle, but only within the intel community,” Devine said. “So when she went to the police, she was very much on her own. It’s an obnoxious loophole.”

Such a classic - "You can only complain to the people who won't do anything"

[-] Silentiea@lemm.ee 95 points 9 months ago

I get the whole "national security" bit, at least to a degree...

But if America's national security is at risk because a woman told the cops she was assaulted, something is very wrong.

[-] mukt@lemmy.ml 10 points 9 months ago

What kind of secrets are there that voters must not be aware about? Not one.

[-] belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org 5 points 9 months ago

The "national security" bit is not wanting to get our government's horrid actions made public.

load more comments (3 replies)
this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
282 points (99.3% liked)

World News

32378 readers
711 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS