383

What's America's view on this Tucker Carlson?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 13 points 9 months ago

Mutually assured destruction is pretty much why no one will ever actually go through with that if their target also has nukes or is protected by a country that has them. It's one of the major reasons no country that has nukes wants to disarm.

[-] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 5 points 9 months ago

Ask Libya and Ukraine how that worked out

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Sorry... do you think Libya with nuclear weapons under Gaddafi would have been a good idea?

[-] 52fighters@sopuli.xyz 1 points 9 months ago

Gaddafi would still be alive. Dictators now need nuclear weapons to assure survival. Look for the world to get real crazy real fast.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

There are 57 dictatorships in the world. Almost none of them have nuclear weapons.

https://planetrulers.com/current-dictators/

[-] 52fighters@sopuli.xyz 1 points 9 months ago

You realize Muammar Gaddafi only died 12 years ago and Russia only invaded Ukraine two years ago? Nuclear weapon programs take at least that long to develop. Ukraine and Libya had programs (Ukraine actually had weapons) and abandoned them, much to their demise. If they kept their programs, they wouldn't have had these problems.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Okay, but that's not what you said before. You claimed, and as I pasted: "Dictators now need nuclear weapons to assure survival."

Please explain how the vast majority of dictatorships are surviving without them. Or do all 57 have nuclear weapons?

[-] 52fighters@sopuli.xyz 1 points 9 months ago

Many of them will lack the lasting power of North Korea.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Please provide evidence for this claim. An age of dictatorships chart will do.

You aren't just making that up, right? You do have the data, don't you?

[-] 52fighters@sopuli.xyz 1 points 8 months ago

The key word in my comment is "will." That's a prediction. You can ping me in 25 years to see if this works out. In the mean time, people are taking this prediction seriously (it isn't only my prediction) when discussing global politics.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024
383 points (91.4% liked)

World News

39026 readers
1236 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS