379

submitted 9 months ago by voodooattack@lemmy.world to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

39 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] candyman337@sh.itjust.works 62 points 9 months ago

Columbus and his men killed a lot of people brutally. He wasn't really a conqueror, more a murderer and a monster

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 18 points 9 months ago

He is far from distinguished in that endeavor. What makes him relevant to history is the part where he found people to brutalize, way the fuck elsewhere.

The Mongols just saw some towns out across the grasslands and said "I'll have that." Ad nauseum.

[-] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 4 points 9 months ago

Technically, he didn't even find them first. Not only did Christopher Columbus never step foot on the NA continent, but Norsemen such as Leif Erikson were there before him centuries earlier. John Cabot made a much larger contribution to that.

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago

Historical nitpicks and footnootes. The unambiguous inflection point for all of Europe going "holy shit, new lands" was that Italian schmuck and his three boats.

Leif and company went "hey look, more Greenland" and barely amounted to Discovery channel dramatization. The century after Columbus's return transformed three continents.