855
rule (lemmy.sdf.org)
submitted 7 months ago by lars@lemmy.sdf.org to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

according to @Custoslibera’s post

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Zozano@lemy.lol 1 points 7 months ago

The irony is palpable lol.

It's my fault for not understanding that using that term online is not going to be understood how I intended it, based on how it has been defined for me (Even when I showed the dictionary definition)

Though it is even more funny that so many people cannot accept that a word has more than one term, and based on how I used it in context, it actually does mean how I intended it.

In any case, I really don't want to discuss the definition further. Hopefully people can understand what I meant in context, even if the definition they are familiar with, is different.

[-] lemmingrad@thelemmy.club 1 points 7 months ago

I do understand (and I am sure you mean well, not attacking you as a person). But the confusion isn't just a detail here, it's inherent to what you're saying. Look up what happened in Berlin in 1933, for example. Liberal conciliating attitude paved the way to nazism.

[-] Zozano@lemy.lol 1 points 7 months ago

Do you mean liberal as in how I defined it in my post above? Or how others have meant it, as in Libertarian/Liberalism?

this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2024
855 points (100.0% liked)

196

16238 readers
1897 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS