98
Windows 11 24H2 to enforce hardware requirement - gHacks Tech News
(www.ghacks.net)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2024
98 points (98.0% liked)
Technology
59623 readers
1227 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Windows 11 adds nothing good to 10, and introduces a bunch of highly anti-consumer features that are difficult if not impossible to disable. There's absolutely no good reason to "upgrade" to 11 if you already have 10.
To reach their own. I don't give a hoot about the features in Windows, as long as it runs my games. And I like the look of Windows 11 more than I do 10. So that's good enough for me. It doesn't affect me more than the aesthetics. To me it's an upgrade.
Until the Windows 10 eol at least. Man I don't want 14.10.25 to come
Meh, OS's don't die at EOL. There are thousands, if not millions, of machines running Win2k that simply can't be upgraded because they run industry systems.
And before anyone cries about security - if you're relying on the OS for your security you're ignoring everything else (the other layers) that are required... You're doing it wrong.
There are thousands (tens of thousands?) of Win2k machines that can't be upgraded because they drive industry systems. Hell, there's Win95 machines doing the same. Their security is ensured by incorporating layers of control... As should be done with any system, commensurate with it's risk and criticality.
You are also forgetting millions of consumers still running Windows XP or 7 and not upgrading not because something critical depends on it, but because "if it ain't broken, don't fix it".
If there are exploitable remote execution attacks at the OS level that's a pretty big hole to fill in with additional measures. Anything short of totally isolated would be a risk imo.