256
submitted 9 months ago by NightOwl@lemmy.ca to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] davel@lemmy.ml -3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)
[-] mellowheat@suppo.fi -5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Is there any reason to think "prolewiki" is more reliable than wikipedia?

ProleWiki is a collaborative Marxist-Leninist project aiming to build an anti-imperialist communist encyclopedia with information on current events, communist parties worldwide, countries, as well as hosting a library of texts important to the international communist movement.

Seems like it's openly biased. And while I can appreciate the honesty, I'm not sure how it can be viewed as reliable.

[-] AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml 10 points 9 months ago

Wikipedia is extremely unreliable and biased, and not even on political topics, even linguistical and scientific articles are prone to huge issues. (see: Scottish Gaelic) If you wish to call prolewiki as biased, I must tell you that wikipedia is even worse, it just has a more liberal bias. Follow their sources and you will see. ProleWiki discloses the bias up front, and has an squad of source patrollers who make sure when a claim is made, it is grounded in reality that can be sourced. Sure, there aren't that many articles on it yet, but we strive to set a high standard because the slightest weak link in the project will be used by people like yourself to discredit us.

Disclaimer: I am a ProleWiki contributor.

this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
256 points (93.2% liked)

World News

32316 readers
554 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS