543
submitted 9 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Donald Trump’s first criminal trial is officially on the books—and it starts before the election.

GOP front-runner Donald Trump is officially headed to court next month—the first of his four upcoming criminal trials expected sometime this year.

On Thursday, Trump headed to New York for a court hearing on his hush-money case. Judge Juan Manuel Merchan ignored his requests for a delay and determined the trial would start on March 25, when jury selection will begin.

Trump is accused of using his former fixer Michael Cohen to sweep an affair with porn actress Stormy Daniels under the rug ahead of the 2016 presidential election.

As a result, he’s facing 34 felony charges in this case for allegedly falsifying business records with the intent to further an underlying crime. Trump has pleaded not guilty on all counts.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ryrybang@lemmy.world 165 points 9 months ago

Trump's attorney said it was "unfathomable" that Trump would be ready to balance his legal obligations with his campaigning.

I can't believe this stuff is even allowed in open court. Campaigning isn't even a job. It's a 100% optional thing somebody chooses to do in running for elected office. It can be stopped at any moment for any reason, completely and willingly.

A court date for multiple felonies is an obligation. It's much higher priority. There's no comparison.

If it is a fair excuse, then I guess we should all be campaigning.

Sorry boss, it's unfathomable to work today because I need to campaign. Sorry your honor, jury duty is unfathomable because I'm working the crowds. Sorry IRS, can't file my taxes this year because I'm busy raising money on social media.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 43 points 9 months ago

Trump is a sovcit in all but name. He'll never acknowledge that any court has authority over him.

[-] Patches@sh.itjust.works 20 points 9 months ago

That's the thing about Sovcits. They don't have to acknowledge the authority of a higher entity to face the consequences.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 4 points 9 months ago

Yeah but he may turn out to be the exception, then we're fucked.

[-] ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world 41 points 9 months ago

This is all completely ignoring the absurdity of allowing an individual who has been indicted for election interference to participate in an election in any capacity.

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Indictment does not mean guilty. Though I bet he could still run when he’s found guilty.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

He’ll run from prison if he ever finally gets a real sentence.

[-] thetreesaysbark@sh.itjust.works 22 points 9 months ago

Or just the obvious.

'Sorry I can't come to my court hearing because I have to work'

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think the court cares.

[-] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 9 months ago

You mostly can't get out of jury duty with that one. (Exceptions happen)

[-] NABDad@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

You certainly can't get out of your own criminal trial because you have to work.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Sorry your honor, my client is too busy committing other crimes to attend this trial.

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 18 points 9 months ago

Does this mean if you're employed, you could just commit countless crimes and then postpone the trials indefinitely? "Sorry I can't have a murder trial right now, I'm scheduled to open tomorrow at MacDonalds."

[-] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

If you're poor enough to need a job, that rule isn't for you.

[-] TrippaSnippa@aussie.zone 6 points 9 months ago

Just announce that you're running for office, then the charges become election interference.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

Do game campaigns count? Because I have a serious backlog!

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago
[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yes we have to remember the things that are important. 😋

[-] Gimpydude@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 9 months ago

He is legally required to do this. He is not legally required to campaign.

[-] mPony@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

The attorney is saying that this jerk shouldn't have to face legal obligations. He is far too busy for things like due process.

this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
543 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19144 readers
1457 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS