1144
submitted 9 months ago by HowRu68@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Plastic producers have known for more than 30 years that recycling is not an economically or technically feasible plastic waste management solution. That has not stopped them from promoting it, according to a new report.

“The companies lied,” said Richard Wiles, president of fossil-fuel accountability advocacy group the Center for Climate Integrity (CCI), which published the report. “It’s time to hold them accountable for the damage they’ve caused.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago

Really. For the vast majority of packaging, what the fuck was wrong with just using cardboard? Even if 99.99999999% of the stuff winds up in a landfill, at least cardboard is theoretically renewable and will biodegrade in less than a thousand lifetimes.

[-] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 33 points 9 months ago

Cardboard and paper bags went out of style because of the "save the rainforest" narrative. Even though most paper products are made from trees specifically grown to be harvested for their wood.

That's why we started using plastic bags at grocery stores, remember?

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

That was what they told us. The reason they actually did it was because they were giving us the bags and they cost a nickel. where plastic bags cost them 5 for a penny.

[-] Rinna@lemm.ee 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Hemp is very versatile and can be used to make similar paper products while growing at a much faster rate, which potentially makes it a good replacement. The association with marijuana is part of what prevented it from catching on though.

[-] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Mostly it was the paper and textile industries lobbying against cannabis so that the superior products that can be made with hemp were illegal and didn't stand in the way of their infrastructure and market segment.

That alone probably fueled the drug war against it as much as the government using it to crack down on any minority they could illustrate as using it more often.

[-] buzz86us@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

Their green washing BS lists that it has to be harvested more as a negative.

[-] Rinna@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

...like lumber doesnt take far more effort per harvest, as well as take longer to grow?

[-] Dragon_Titan@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

Besides timber the no.1 reason is agricultural land

[-] Whippygoatcream@reddthat.com 3 points 9 months ago

So what about samples (amongst other parts of the entire process) for food-grade products from the manufacturer? I work at a corn syrup manufacturing plant, and there's no way you can ship corn syrup in cardboard. You would get mold, easily.

[-] acetanilide@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

I think it'd be very easy to use plastic when we actually need it, and other materials for everything else.

Unfortunately businesses and stockholders disagree.

[-] Grass@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

Pretty much nothing biodegrades in a landfill though.

[-] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Then why do they have to deal with so much methane?

this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
1144 points (99.7% liked)

World News

39099 readers
1462 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS