204
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] uberdroog@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

She just wasn't the VP we need. At 81 there are some that will take that into account.

[-] Drusas@kbin.social 8 points 11 months ago

At his age, he should be considering his VP very carefully. It matters.

[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

There is nothing wrong with her personally. It's simply the intersection of sexism and racism that makes things harder for all female minorities in positions of power. The same is true for Fawny Willis, AOC, even Michelle Obama. Democrats aren't immune.

[-] Tinidril@midwest.social 17 points 11 months ago

Kamala is a black female, therefore anyone who doesn't like her is sexist/racist?

There are plenty of reasons to dislike Harris. She is an establishment goon with zero relatability. Decisions she made as a prosecutor have made her deeply unliked specifically among black voters. She performed terribly in the primary, only registering positive attention once, when she attacked Biden for supporting racist bussing policy. She was foisted on us anyways, unless we wanted Trump as president.

The Democratic establishment took advantage of the Trump crisis and forced the candidate of their choosing onto voters that had just solidly rejected her. That alone is good reason to dislike her.

If Biden manages to beat Trump, I seriously doubt he will make it for 4 years. That means we will have Harris as the next encombant. If Biden lasts 2 years then Harris will be eligible for two full terms which means we may have to wait until 2036 before we get another primary. Biden is going to run on saving Democracy from Trump, and I'll probably puke every time I have to hear it.

[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Kamala is a black female, therefore anyone who doesn't like her is sexist/racist?

No, but enough of the population is one the other or both to seriously harm her chances. You really think the majority are as educated about her performance as you are? Doubtful

[-] Tinidril@midwest.social 2 points 11 months ago

So we default to assuming prejudice? One of the groups she seriously underperforms with are blacks, and specifically young blacks. Do you think it's the color of her skin, or the number of young blacks she incarcerated that drives that?

But let's assume the worst and say that she is massively disliked because of race and gender prejudice. If the country is really in that state and a black woman is unelectable, then why would we run a black woman? Are black women in America well served by electing Trump again? I would personally love to see a black woman as president, but do we risk the country to get there?

Fortunately, I don't think this is the case but, if it were, I don't think it's all that favorable an argument for her candidacy. If someone is incapable of winning, then we shouldn't be nominating them.

[-] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

no there's definitely something wrong with her personally, we don't get to blame this one on bigotry. She's as milquetoast as they come and her past as a prosecutor just doesn't inspire any kind of enthusiasm from anyone left of "elightened centrist"

[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

If you think being milquetoast means they can't be presidential, that's a problem right there.

[-] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

lol. That's straight up not what I said and wtf does "presidential" even mean?

[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

Basically I am saying that just because someone is good on TV doesn't mean they are qualified to run a country.

this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2024
204 points (92.1% liked)

politics

19338 readers
770 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS