79
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by Lwaxana@startrek.website to c/science@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

You mean we should just cut emissions and not try to remove CO2? Or am I missing something in the article?

I don't think we can do enough off that list to make enough difference. And we're already hitting positive feedback cycles so we need some way to remove CO2. I doubt either of those things will happen, but theoretically we need both now.

[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

You have a finite amount of resources. Your want to reduce/limit global warming add much as possible. So you need to spend the resources as effective as possible, not in applications that cost 10x as much for the same effect.

this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2024
79 points (95.4% liked)

science

20921 readers
251 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS