view the rest of the comments
Selfhosted
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
-
No spam posting.
-
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
-
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
-
No trolling.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
Sorry to hear, I feel you:
I wanted to delete all .m3u-files in my music collection when I learned:
find ./ -name "*.m3u" -delete
-> this would have been the right way, all .m3u in the current folder would have been deleted.find ./ -delete -name "*.m3u
" -> WRONG, this just deletes the current folder and everything in it.Who would have known, that the position of -delete actually matters.
I didn't know there was a -delete option to find! I've been piping to xargs -0 for decades!
Probably because it's easier to fuck up. With piping to xargs, you are forced to put the delete command last.
I did this sort of mistakes too, luckily BTRFS snapshots are always here to save the day !
fd -tf -e m3u -x rm
loads all cores and nothing works fasterI can recommend fd to everyone frustrated with find, it has a much more intuitive interface imo, and it's also significantly faster.
I use GNU find every day and still have to google about the details. Only learnt about - delete the other day, good to know the position matters.
The first one would have deleted nothing as it needs to match the whole name. I recommend running find with an explicit -print before replacing it in place with -delete or -exec. It's good to remember that find has a complex order dependent language with -or and -and, but not maybe the best idea to try to use those features.
Lemmy interpreted the
*
as something cursive. I try to edit it like I mean it.