704
submitted 9 months ago by olivebranch@lemmy.ca to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] xlash123@sh.itjust.works 27 points 9 months ago

Criticism of the comic aside, two party system is still definitely undesirable. I believe it is a side effect of first past the post voting. What we really should implement is ranked choice voting. It gets rid of the dumb "voting third party is voting for [opposite party]" argument by letting you vote for who you want guilt-free and falling back on your lower-ranked votes if #1 wasn't popular enough.

But you know, this will always meet resistance because politicians would lose their jobs for implementing this.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/STAR_voting

STAR voting allows you to say "I refuse to vote for this candidate at all," which certain implementations of RCV do not. It can and has ended up with candidates no one wanted winning in Australia, and other places that have implemented RCV

[-] aspensmonster@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 9 months ago

STAR Voting fails the Later-No-Harm criterion, which makes it a no-go for me. Any voting system that can have lesser ranked candidates siphoning off support from higher ranked candidates is, for me at least, a fundamentally broken system that ultimately just reverts to FPTP when people start bullet voting to avoid that flaw.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_electoral_systems#Compliance_of_selected_single-winner_methods

this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
704 points (77.6% liked)

Memes

45731 readers
1139 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS