105

Journalist's death prompts Russian outrage over Ukraine's alleged use of cluster bombs (www.reuters.com)

submitted 1 year ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

110 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

You decided to shut off your brain. It’s illegal to criticize the war as a Russian. That isn’t true of Ukraine or it’s supporters. So you’re making a false comparison.

Are you just saying that russia could lie about western journalists? They can do that new, or whenever, or always. They’re dishonest about that kind of thing all the time, and they have broken so many international laws with this war that being worried that this could be their big opening to start breaking the law is just silly. So silly that I don’t think you’re arguing in good faith.

[-] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 year ago

I'll try to make this point even more directly: killing journalists is a war crime.

There are some occasions when this war crime is excused. For example, when there is no other choice and the the killing is proportionate to the achievement of some other legitimate aim but only if the civilians have been warned effectively. That exception does not appear to apply in the instant circumstances because the victims (one died, three were injured) were all journalists.

Facts that do not alter this conclusion:

The journalist being a propagandist;
Having one's 'own side' commit the same or other war crimes;
The legality of the war;
The proximity of actual soldiers;
The extent to which this law is enforced or enforceable.

The reason I am talking about the killing of a Russian journalist is because he is the subject of the linked article in the post.

End of main point.

If the accusation of being a propagandist justified the killing of journalists, it would also negate the criminal aspect of any such killings by Russia. Russia could simply claim that western journalists are propagandists. It is irrelevant that you think all Russian journalists are propagandists because they will same the same in reverse. Westerners are not entitled to be the sole arbiters of which side is right. Further, there's no 'if' because being a propagandist does not justify the killing of journalists, according to international law.

On another occasion, I would enjoy talking through the state of western and Russian media but for now it is a red herring and is obfuscating the main point.

[-] pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

At the top of your post, you said some things that would take time to verify. At the bottom, you repeated your same absurd argument where you aren’t willing to accept that Russian journalists are propagandists even though it is illegal for them to be critical of the war. And you assert that western journalists are just as likely to be propagandists even though they are actually free to report what they want. You are arguing in bad faith.

[-] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I'm begging you to re-read what I said but read it carefully. I chose my words with care and they mean almost the exact opposite of what you think they mean.

If you would like to verify the top part, you could start here: https://lemmygrad.ml/comment/1115946

[-] pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago

You didn’t read what I wrote. If you did, then you’d know I was responding directly to the point you’re trying to make. It doesn’t matter if Ukraine or it’s supporters give Russia justification to start committing war crimes. They already are and have been from the beginning.

[-] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm unsure if you're unwilling to understand or unable to understand. Either way, we're not going to make much progress. I must make a final cla[r]ification lest other readers assume that your (inaccurate) interpretation of my words is correct.

you repeated your same absurd argument where you aren’t willing to accept that Russian journalists are propagandists even though it is illegal for them to be critical of the war.

I'm saying it doesn't matter whether the Russian journalist was making propaganda. Being a propagandist does not count as direct participation in war under international law. That means that even propagandists are counted as civilians. Therefore it is illegal to kill them.

I also told you that the propaganda point was a red herring. I'm not making any claim as to who is or who is not a propagandist. It is irrelevant.

And you assert that western journalists are just as likely to be propagandists even though they are actually free to report what they want.

No, I do not. I'm saying that Russia could claim that, and that westerners do not have a monopoly on truth. So if the propaganda point was germane (it's not), it would apply to both sides and grant carte blanche to commit war crimes.

You are arguing in bad faith.

You have said this before and then attributed claims to me that I have not made. That is almost the definition of bad faith, but I am willing to put it down to simple confusion. I'm going to call it a day here because I can't work on improving your comprehension while you think I'm saying things (which I am not saying) that clearly upset you.

Edit: grammar

[-] pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Russia bombs hospitals and schools and homes. Also Russia: how dare you kill journalists that are embedded with our troops using cluster bombs similar to the ones we’ve killed many of your civilians with while trying to subjugate you all!

You’re being dishonest and trying to steer the subject in a new direction because your profit comments on this matter are absurd.