747
submitted 2 years ago by ezmack@lemmy.ml to c/dataisbeautiful@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] over_clox@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago

I have examined this abstraction of a map thoroughly.

I do not see any garbage dumps, recycling facilities, sewage processing, cemeteries, energy production, water production...

I could carry on, but this map means almost nothing with all sorts of factors missing.

[-] Distributed@lemmy.ml 21 points 2 years ago

Without digging in to the numbers further than just looking at this map, could this be because the relative areas of the factors you listed didn't pass a threshold to make it? @ezmack what data source was used for this?

[-] over_clox@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Not OP, but I'd think cemeteries should outweigh golf courses in land area.

Feel free to prove me wrong though.

[-] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I think you might underestimate golf course land use, as well as miss that a lot of that mightve just been counted with the surrounding neighborhoods, since that's more of a community service

load more comments (5 replies)
this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
747 points (92.5% liked)

Data Is Beautiful

8407 readers
1 users here now

A place to share and discuss data visualizations. #dataviz

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS