79
submitted 6 months ago by Jenoki@lemmy.ml to c/piracy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] emhl@feddit.de 72 points 6 months ago

if you snatch a popular torrent that is fine but with dying torrents that is quite harmful

[-] Steve@startrek.website 22 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Agree. I dont delete anything unless the quality is shit

[-] Jenoki@lemmy.ml 13 points 6 months ago

I'm considering getting a seedbox because with my current storage setup, and my unwillingness to keep the vpn up all the time 2.0 is the best I can do.

[-] Osa-Eris-Xero512@kbin.social 14 points 6 months ago

This was annoying me too, and I solved it by spinning out a VM that exists just to run qbittorrent and the vpn connection.

[-] Fisch@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 months ago

I use Gluetun for that. It's a docker container that sets up the VPN and qBittorrent in two containers and routes all traffic from qBittorrent through the VPN.

[-] Xirup@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 months ago
[-] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 39 points 6 months ago

Because 200% should be your minimum, not your max. 🤌🏼

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)
[-] Rustmilian@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

If there's no one left to seed, the torrent dies. Seeding back at least 200% ensures the torrent stays healthy.

[-] ZeroEcks@lemmy.ml 19 points 6 months ago

Sometimes you need to seed back more than 200% because the other two people might not be able to seed it back. I would generally not set a limit

[-] Rustmilian@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

True, but as a minimum you should be doing 200%.
Also in a ideal scenario that 200% would be spread out to a lot more people then just 2.

[-] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

OP is showing 200% as their maximum. That's the whole point of this thread. 🤌🏼

[-] Rustmilian@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago
[-] littlebluespark@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago

I'm not the one reiterating the salient point of a very short thread. Might do well to read that to yourself instead, friendo. 🤗

[-] Rustmilian@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I have no time for children.

[-] jeffreyosborne@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

yo momma🤌🏿

[-] NateSwift@beehaw.org 12 points 6 months ago

It will lead to the torrent dying if everyone stops seeding

[-] blindsight@beehaw.org 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

If there are less than 5 seeds, then I keep seeding indefinitely. Above that, I'll consider deleting it to free up space once I'm done with the media.

Unless it's from a private tracker, in which case I'll just seed everything forever to get the sweet bonus points.

[-] Catsrules@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

How does that work, does the downloader just cycling though seeding torrents or do they all stay active? I feel like there would be so much torrents over time it would slow everything down.

[-] blindsight@beehaw.org 1 points 6 months ago

I looked it up, and qBittorrent can easily handle hundreds of torrents, apparently. I haven't noticed any problems running 180-ish. I'll probably try to keep it capped to 300 or something like that.

[-] Catsrules@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

Does it matter how many files are in each torrent?

I would think a 100 file torrent would be more intensive than a 3 file torrent.

[-] blindsight@beehaw.org 1 points 6 months ago

I don't think it has any effect at all, but I'm not an expert. It's just sending data by request based on hashes and indices, isn't it?

this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2024
79 points (75.2% liked)

Piracy

11 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to /c/piracy

No netflix or streaming services landlubbers allowed, this is pirates territory.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS