1093
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mlg@lemmy.world 53 points 2 years ago

For a fraction of the cost, Netflix could have instead just frame remastered the original show into 16:9 (not lazy cropping) and spent most of the effort into marketing it properly to gain a much wider audience.

But that would involve talent, critical thinking, and accepting that animation is a format not a genre. So naturally they just bought the rights so they could have their version of Star Wars/Harry Potter.

I could go on an entire rant about how even thinking making an animated show into a live action is a stupid idea, no matter how much money you throw at it, but I think I'll just wait for E;R's 2 hour youtube special instead lmao.

[-] Katana314@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

Has this ever been done? Taken an entire TV series animated in 4:3, and just adding content to the sides of the screen on every single frame?

[-] zaphod@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

God I hope they never try that.

The best visual artists are extremely effective in their use of space. A 4:3 image expanded to 16:9 would just look weird, as the framing would simply not look right.

The alternative is some amount of expansion and cropping but it would still not look nearly as good as leaving the artwork in it's original aspect ratio.

A great example is Seinfeld which looks frickin terrible in 16:9:

https://consequence.net/2021/10/seinfeld-aspect-ratio-netflix/

[-] vardogor@mander.xyz 4 points 2 years ago

it can be done well. off the top of my head, a couple good examples are south park and marvelous misadventures of flapjack

[-] Azzu@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago

I only know South Park, but from what I remember most of the shots there weren't particularly cinematic, most of it was pretty "matter of fact" with the main action/focus to the middle of the characters with everything else around just being eye-candy non-important filler. I could imagine it then working much better.

[-] vardogor@mander.xyz 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago

That's why you have it done by an actual animation studio with actual artists who can redo the composition if necessary. Way easier to do with animation than with anything else, technically speaking, e.g. you can crop out characters, reconstruct the matte and move the characters elsewhere without having to account for fancy realistic lighting.

The alternative is to be Babylon 5 which was shot on 16:9, framed for 16:9 but making sure a 4:3 crop doesn't cut away important bits, in anticipation of the new format, alas the CGI was done in 4:3 and quite low res and noone has ever bothered to prepare a proper 16:9 release (and with the remake on the horizon that ever happening becomes more and more unlikely). There's a version out there in acceptable 16:9, though: Most of the footage doesn't include CGI and so is fine as-is, arguably better than the 4:3 crop, and the panned/zoomed CGI parts aren't too jarring. Definitely blurry, though. I'd actually recommend it over the original release, imperfect as it is.

[-] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I'll just wait for E;R's 2 hour youtube special instead

Didn't that guy get revealed to be a ~~nazi sympathizer~~ straight up neo nazi that peppers propaganda into his videos """as a joke""" and got pewdiepie in a lot of shit for shouting him out?

edit: yeah I just went back and watched a reupload of one of the videos (the SU fusion video) that I actually enjoyed before I really understood what fascist propaganda looked like or how to consume media critically and... wow. Even "censored" to get past youtube's filters, it's much worse than I remembered.

this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2024
1093 points (96.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

10763 readers
609 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS