754
submitted 9 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Gretchen Whitmer responds to calls by some Democrats to vote ‘uncommitted’ in Michigan’s primary on Tuesday

Gretchen Whitmer, the Michigan governor, pushed back on calls to not vote for Joe Biden over his handling of the Israel-Gaza conflict, saying on Sunday that could help Trump get re-elected.

“It’s important not to lose sight of the fact that any vote that’s not cast for Joe Biden supports a second Trump term,” she said on Sunday during an interview on CNN’s State of the Union. “A second Trump term would be devastating. Not just on fundamental rights, not just on our democracy here at home, but also when it comes to foreign policy. This was a man who promoted a Muslim ban.”

Whitmer, who is a co-chair of Biden’s 2024 campaign, also said she wasn’t sure what to expect when it came to the protest vote.

Rashida Tlaib, a Democrat who is the only Palestinian-American serving in Congress, urged Democrats last week to vote “uncommitted” in Michigan’s 27 February primary.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

If shes so concerned about people turning on Biden, maybe she needs to head to the oval office and tell him to stop fucking funding and equiping a goddamn genocide.

Cause one thing you forget, Democrats are not cultists. We will not tie ourselves into knots trying to defend your bullshit. We will call out, and criticize you when its appropriate.

and supporting and equiping a fucking genocide is a pretty goddamn appropriate thing to be criticizing Biden on.

Its not on the voters to get over it.

Its on Biden to stop fucking doing it and to tell Israel to fuck off.

Is Israel apartheid and slaughtering the Palestinians really so important that you'd throw away the election for?

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 17 points 9 months ago
[-] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

Is being noble on Gaza worth risking Gaza being obliterated by Trump and the GOP?

And Ukraine being destroyed by Russia? And women's rights further eroding? And LGBTQ rights further eroding?

Even if you accept the premise that Biden and Trump are equally bad for Gaza, there's so many other issues on the table.

[-] christian@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Is being noble on Gaza worth risking Gaza being obliterated by Trump and the GOP?

I'm going to ignore the implication that "being noble on Gaza" is actually more risky for him and just assume that's true. What the fuck kind of question is this?? Biden should absolutely change course to being noble on Gaza. Yes it is worth the risk, arguing that he shouldn't take that risk is saying you're okay with continuing to sacrifice Palestinian lives over the coming months if it means a better chance of beating Trump and saving them from a theoretical worse fate.

Sure, there's a chance Biden will lose the election anyway, but I'm sure they're capable of understanding how necessary their sacrifice was. I actually kind of hope that you're one of the people who thinks we all should support Israel and that you're making a bad attempt to play sympathetic here, because this this is an absolutely ludicrous contortion to justify continuing to fund a genocide.

No one makes the decision to continue funding the destruction of a people out of concern for what those people might go through if you don't. Total horseshit.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee -1 points 9 months ago

Is being noble on Gaza worth risking Gaza being obliterated by Trump and the GOP?

I was talking about the voters, not Biden.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

Because you expect one to change and not the other.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

They always want to blame the voters. Its always the voters fault.

Its our fault for failing democracy. Not the candidates fault for betraying it.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee -2 points 9 months ago

Yes, I do.

I was contributing to Liz Warren and Bernie in 2019.

Never got one person knocking on my door to see if I needed a ride to the polls.

Read up on the Moral Majority and Jerry Falwell. Falwell went to the grassroots of the GOP and got his agenda enshrined because his people worked the system.

The Left had four years to get Bernie nominated. The Left failed Bernie and me.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Congrats for being literally the problem.

Maybe hold your representatives accountable, rather than getting angry at other people having the audacity to do what you refuse to do.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee -2 points 9 months ago

So, I'm the problem because I donated to Bernie?

Or because I'd rather have Biden have a big win over Trump?

Or because I actually put out a roadmap the Left could use?

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

No. You're the problem cause you literally ignore what we were just talking about, because its inconvenient for whatever ridiculous complex you have going on, so instead you are arguing against a completely made up comment that no one made.

You're the problem because you have fallen into the right wing mindset of blind worship and admiration, of turning against anyone who dare to utter a criticism, no matter how factual and valid, against dear leader.

Which leads one to ask if you are actually this fucking obtuse, or if you're just here saying your stupid shit just to troll.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 0 points 9 months ago

The Right went out and mobilized effective grassroots organizations that got out the vote and stood firm.

The Left didn't do that.

Getting mad at me isn't going to change anything.

Left voters had four years to make sure Bernie got the nomination. They failed.

Back in the day, the SDS could organize a march on Washington with mimeograph machines and payphone.

Finally, at this point, the choice is Trump and the GOP, who have literally called for the deaths of all Palestinians, and Biden, who hasn't.

If Biden wins in November, I'll be able to vote for someone else in 2028.

If Trump wins, I will probably never be allowed to vote again.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Okay now you're not even a troll, You're just a poorly programmed bot if you're now just copy and pasting irrelevant responses.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 0 points 9 months ago

Because I know I'm never going to agree with any politician 100% ever.

[-] kava@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Option 1) vote for the guy that we know with certainty supports the genocide - he sends money, bombs, and military aid (aircraft carriers, navy ships, squadrons of fighter jets) in order to defend Israel from other threats

He diplomatically shields Israel from consequences by vetoing any possible UNSC resolution that would stop the bloodshed.

Option 2) vote for the guy who probably would do all the same stuff.

So 100% versus 90%

90% is the rational decision. If Gaza is your one-issue that determines your voting, you should vote for Trump.

And you may say how unethical, Trump is racist and helped kill Roe V Wade and he's a lunatic who wants to take over the country - and you'd be right.

But are you really going to tell a group of people that are being slaughtered with impunity that your issues are more important than the life and death of tens of thousands of people?

I refuse to vote for Trump because I'm a one-issue voter too... but likewise I do not want to vote for Biden because they are identical on that issue.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago

I would put it this way.

If Biden wins in 2024, I'm sure I'll be able to vote for someone else in 2028.

If Trump wins, I'm pretty sure there's never going to be another election.

this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
754 points (94.6% liked)

politics

19144 readers
1420 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS