394
submitted 2 years ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

When Alabama's Supreme Court defined frozen embryos as children, the shock and confusion was immediate. Major hospitals pulled fertility services and would-be parents scrambled for clarity on what would happen next.

The debate over reproductive rights in America has long been driven, in part, by opposition to abortion from Christian groups - but this ruling has divided that movement and ignited debate about the role of theology in US lawmaking.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 39 points 2 years ago

Can I just ask why more babies being born is seen as a moral good? I'm dumbfounded because I've honestly never in fifty years heard this talking point before.

[-] tacosplease@lemmy.world 44 points 2 years ago

It's really this simple. The bible says "Be fruitful and multiply"

[-] KingOfSleep@lemmy.ca 39 points 2 years ago

When the line "be fruitful and multiply" was first written there were fewer humans on the planet than now live in Houston.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Ehhh, a bit more than Houston. By 2000 BCE there were 20,000,000 humans on the planet, though I believe the majority of those were in China. Genesis was written between 1500-1200 BCE.

[-] pacmondo@sh.itjust.works 38 points 2 years ago

A bunch of white people in the united states are worried about birth rates because immigrant birth rates are high whereas white birth rates are on the decline. They're worried about white people becoming a minority because even though if you asked them they would say no, they know that minorities are treated poorly here.

[-] RattlerSix@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago

Yep. It's called "replacement theory" and it's a core belief among racist organizations like Nazis, the Aryan nation and the KKK. It's also talked about constantly on Fox News and other right wing media.

[-] 4am@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

Oh for sure, but the problem is they’re preaching is subtly and if you were’t already on alert that it’s bullshit, it can end up normalizing for some people since it’s not usually framed as “white vs black/brown” but as “ Americans vs enemies”, which sounds a lot less racially charged to mega normies who pay more attention to football and soap operas than they do to politics.

[-] RattlerSix@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Exactly. They're subtle about it and it needs to be pointed out as much s possible.

[-] ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 years ago

core belief among racist organizations

A bit outdated examples, try these:

CPAC, RNC, John Birch Society, Heritage Foundation

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 5 points 2 years ago

They're the same picture.

[-] ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 years ago

This is also behind the trans panic and concurrent anti-LGBTQ legislation in conservative states.

Sure, they'll package it with scripture and moralizing, but in the end? It's all about fear.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago

I wish everyone would just fuck everyone once and for all so we're all the same god damned race.

[-] 4am@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

You know damn well they’d find something else to divide us, you just tryna get laid is all 😏

[-] frostysauce@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

They'll find anything to divide us except haves vs. have-nots. Which is the true division.

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 years ago

You should run on the "everyone needs to fuck everyone " platform

[-] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Minorities are treated poorly pretty much everywhere

[-] pacmondo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

Yes, I was just alluding to the fact that majorities typically don't like to talk about it.

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I'm not white and used IVF. But definitely you are right on the money.

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I have heard that there are lot of White people in Europe.

However, many of them are not too keen on moving to USA. For some mysterious reasons. 🤷‍♂️

[-] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago

Because a man in a book said something about going forth and multiplying

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago
[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 16 points 2 years ago

I've seen the interview. You can tell the guy is just completely lost in the conversation.

But my question is this: I understand the assertion that embryos are somehow human, whatever, and I have a sort of begrudging respect for anyone who commits to that and opposes abortion because it is murder. Fine. Like politically and morally I'm completely opposed to that and I will fight them every step of the way, but at least I can understand and respect their commitment. I think it's valid to oppose abortion on those grounds, I suppose.

But if the argument is that abortion is wrong because we need more babies to be born, that is a completely different argument. That one says abortion needs to be illegal not because it's killing babies, but because we have to force women to have babies against their will because babies are good.

And don't come at me with, "they've always just been about control and forced birth" because I know that but I also know there are individual people who are just really committed to the idea of embryos as human life. And the right was sort of constrained by the need to keep that particular wool pulled over those particular eyes.

Is this the moment the mask comes off? I'm just... gobsmacked, really. Killing Roe was the absolute worst thing the GOP could do and everyone knows it. They fucking know it. You would think they would try to settle on making some ground to move the arrow, but walk it back a little bit to cool some of the outrage. But no!

I'm just... this is insane.

this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
394 points (97.6% liked)

News

36179 readers
290 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS