82
submitted 6 months ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/us_news@lemmygrad.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] D61@hexbear.net 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The cuts will mainly be in already-empty posts — not actual soldiers — including in jobs related to counter-insurgency that swelled during the Iraq and Afghanistan wars but are not needed as much today. About 3,000 of the cuts would come from Army special operations forces.

No actual soldiers lost from the ranks.

According to the plan, the Army will cut about 10,000 spaces for engineers and similar jobs that were tied to counter-insurgency missions. An additional 2,700 cuts will come from units that don't deploy often and can be trimmed, and 6,500 will come from various training and other posts.

Desk riding soldiers positions cut.

There also will be about 10,000 posts cut from cavalry squadrons, Stryker brigade combat teams, infantry brigade combat teams and security force assistance brigades, which are used to train foreign forces.

Actual direct combat troops positions cut.

In response, the service launched a sweeping overhaul of its recruiting last fall to focus more on young people who have spent time in college or are job hunting early in their careers. And it is forming a new professional force of recruiters, rather than relying on soldiers randomly assigned to the task.

HAHA... professional recruiters instead of soldiers doing a recruiter duty rotation... what could go wrong?

Potential Enlistee: "So, have you been to combat?"

Recruiter: "No."

Potential Enlistee: "So.. um...how long have you been in?"

Recruiter: "Oh... about six months"

Potential Enlistee: "No, I mean, how long have you been in the Army, no just doing recruiting duty?"

Recruiter: "Oh.. I enlisted to be a Recruiter and got out of AIT six months ago. Was assigned to this desk after I graduated and have been here since"

Potential Enlistee: "..."

[-] Shrike502@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 6 months ago

Stryker brigade combat teams

Wait, didn't they make a big show of those? Claiming they're some kinda new and unique invention in military science and whatnot?

[-] D61@hexbear.net 2 points 6 months ago

Iraq for sure and possibly Afghanistan.

They were supposed to be a rapid deployment moderately armored infantry delivery and support platform.

Turns out they are just an extremely large and unweildy truck with a big gun on top that you can't often use without killing your dismounts.

[-] Shrike502@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 6 months ago

So they couldn't even replicate a BTR, huh?

[-] D61@hexbear.net 2 points 6 months ago

I guess they did replicate it... but found that their copy tried to do too much and unsuccessfully.

this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
82 points (98.8% liked)

US News

2013 readers
71 users here now

News from within the empire - From a leftist perspective

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS