98
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

Editing to avoid confusion

Do not confuse Open Collective Foundation with Open Source Collective: https://opencollective.com/opensource/updates/regarding-the-announcement-to-dissolve-open-collective-foundation

This is even more confusing because the org behind Open Collective (opencollective.com) is called " Open Source Collective" whereas the org behind Open Source Collective (oscollective.org) is called Open Collective Foundation.

I believe the author here is confused as well

EDIT: I'm even more confused. Links from oscollective.org point back to opencollective.com. ๐Ÿ˜ตโ€๐Ÿ’ซ

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] D61@hexbear.net 2 points 8 months ago

Profitability might not be the issue, neither are supposed to function solely to make a profit. From the linked blog post, referencing an email, it is stated that its costing more than the revenue can support.

From a general internet search:

c(3)'s can't engage too much (or at all) in legislative stuff but a c(6) can

c(3)'s are supposed to do things to help a group outside of itself while c(6)'s are supposed to exist to support their members

c(6)'s aren't required to report personal information of a person/entity making a donation to the IRS or public

this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
98 points (98.0% liked)

Open Source

31165 readers
115 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS