154
submitted 8 months ago by ZeroCool@slrpnk.net to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

I’m going to wager that the plan was never to raise prices at busy times, it was always to use dynamic pricing to put things on sale and bundle stuff. Hear me out…

This is how dynamic pricing is often used in retail. The sales and bundles dupe you into buying more shit, and that raises your order total.

Wendy’s is not Uber or Lyft. There are MANY options that people have for lunch. If they just raise prices at peak times, people will eat elsewhere.

[-] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Nah, I think they were really going to try and introduce surge pricing until they saw how intense the backlash was, then decided to try and walk it back.

Maybe you are right, but I have a tough time giving these giant companies the benefit of doubt when it's already been shown there was price gouging across the board in the middle of a pandemic.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Oh, I’m not giving them the benefit of the doubt. I 100% think this was a greedy way for them to milk as much money as possible out of their customers.

My guess is that a promo strategy would be the easiest way for them to bleed a wallet. I say that because I’ve worked for some big shitty ecommerce companies that have tested this stuff, and their PR materials all seemed to talk about “saving” money.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com -2 points 8 months ago

What evidence are you basing your conclusion on?

[-] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The very long, very well established history of corporations fucking people over for more profit every time they thought they might be able to get away with it. Did you forget or are you just asking in bad faith?

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com -2 points 8 months ago

So why get pissed at Wendy's in particular?

[-] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

I can be pissed at more than one thing, it's one of my many talents!

[-] copymyjalopy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

Yeah corporations suck but I think you're right. This plan was just poorly worded. Congestion pricing does not make sense for a market with so much competition.

[-] LopensLeftArm@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

You're absolutely right there but I can definitely see some out-of-touch millionaire executive in an office somewhere having the brilliant idea, "We're gonna be the Uber of restaurants!"

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

True, but all they said was “dynamic pricing.”

Everyone assumed this was the surge pricing model, but milking a wallet via a promo engine model is what is more common in retail.

Their PR talked about saving money and luring customers in. I’ll wager that an algorithmic promotion engine was the real play. It would pull customers away from the competition during peak hours, and it would make people buy more by thinking they’re getting a deal.

[-] Uranium3006@kbin.social 0 points 8 months ago

food is a very price sensitive industry

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 0 points 8 months ago

Being suspicious of corporations is great, but it does seem like a lot of people to take any announcement by a big company, interpret it in the least charitable way possible (even if it doesn't make sense), and then get mad based on the interpretation they came up with.

If people were really against variable prices as a concept, they'd already be boycott every business with a happy hour, but they're not. They're just assuming Wendy's plans to dramatically raise prices and was dumb enough to draw attention to it. And really, even without an announcement, raising prices beyond the rate of inflation doesn't make sense, because if they're remotely competent, they're already charging as much as people are willing to pay. Wendy's has every reason to believe that just arbitrarily raising prices faster then the industry as a whole will hurt their bottom line.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

I feel like Lemmy started out as a place to have nuanced conversations, which was a refreshing change from Reddit. But I feel like the confirmation bias in many communities is pretty aggressive now. Nuanced and pragmatic comments are not what bubble up to the top.

this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
154 points (92.3% liked)

News

23360 readers
1898 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS