714
submitted 9 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net

“we’ve waited too long to open the aperture on the solution sets in terms of what we need, as a society, to start reducing emissions,” Woods told Fortune

Archived copies of the article: ghostarchive.org web.archive.org archive.today

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 31 points 9 months ago

That’s a really poor suggestion.

The guillotine was invented as a fast, efficient, humane method of execution. It was meant to take the human factor out of it for a clean, repeatable result.

The device you want is called a wood chipper.

[-] Holzkohlen@feddit.de 7 points 9 months ago

I feel like the guillotine is meant as a symbol. I am also not gonna cannibalize these fucks, but I will tell you to eat them still.

[-] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

That's not very carbon neutral...

[-] rbos@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 months ago
[-] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Well that just sounds like too much work.

[-] Living_Dead@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

Solar powered?

[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol 3 points 9 months ago

I don't know I like the idea of a union gig job of cranking the handle on the wood chipper and going on mandatory lunch break halfway through one of these CEOs

[-] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

They do in fact make electric wood chippers!

[-] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 9 months ago

The device you want is called a wood chipper.

A particularly slow and unsharpened one, though.

Feet first.

And doused in pure capsaicin.

And after having had a branch of that tree that makes you want to kill yourself rectally inserted.

[-] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

The question is, where do we point the wood chipper?

this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
714 points (98.6% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5298 readers
462 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS