111
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by heartheartbreak@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] glans@hexbear.net 23 points 8 months ago

wasn't that an abomination against humanity?

my vague understanding is that bison were carefully managed by indigenous people pre-1492. like a lot of things Europeans mistook for "natural" because they were unable to grasp the scale of the ecological interventions being made and the sophistication of the agricultural methods. And also by the time the norther parts were assessed by europeans, there was significant ecological disorganization caused by the genocide. And then, the genocide was furthered by intentional destruction of these animals in a strategy to destroy the humans.

eg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bison_hunting#Native_American_plains_bison_hunting

[-] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Mostly yes, a little bit no. The bison did experience a bit of a population boom after the population of native stewards got ravaged by disease and displacement. Then gun toting white people went ~~buck~~hogwild. Most "wild" things whites encountered except in the decades immediately after 1492 were in a huge state of instability or desolation.

this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
111 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13538 readers
775 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS