180

Biden administration calls for developers to embrace memory-safe programing languages and move away from those that cause buffer overflows and other memory access vulnerabilities.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ScreaminOctopus@sh.itjust.works 27 points 8 months ago

Pretty crazy to reccomend Java as a secure alternative.

[-] u_tamtam@programming.dev 8 points 8 months ago

Why? What's wrong with safe, managed and fast languages?

[-] zik@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Java's runtime has had a large number of CVEs in the last few years, so that's probably a decent reason to be concerned.

[-] u_tamtam@programming.dev 3 points 8 months ago

Yep but:

  • it's one runtime, so patching a CVE patches it for all programs (vs patching each and every program individually)

  • graalvm is taking care of enabling java to run on java

[-] DampCanary@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

Nothing...

Only that descrition doesn't include Java

[-] ScreaminOctopus@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago

Nothing really, the JVM has a pretty troubled history that would really make me hesitate to call it "safe". It was originally built before anyone gave much thought to security and that fact plauges it to the present day.

[-] u_tamtam@programming.dev 2 points 8 months ago

and how much of this troubled history is linked to Java Applets/native browsers extensions, and how much of it is relevant today?

[-] dukatos@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago
[-] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

There's a difference between writing code on a well-tested and broadly used platform implemented in C++ vs. writing new C++.

this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
180 points (97.4% liked)

World News

32281 readers
664 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS