112
Biden announces U.S. will airdrop food aid into Gaza
(www.nbcnews.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
112 points (95.9% liked)
politics
19097 readers
1693 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
They would be more efficient, if Israel would let them in instead of stopping, searching, and removing items they don't like... like antibiotics, bandages, and food... you know... the usual.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/human-rights-watch-says-israel-is-violating-order-from-top-u-n-court-by-blocking-aid-to-gazans
I've got a plan for that. Send more food. Just keep sending more and let the starving people "loot" them until they're so not-starving they leave leftover food on the trucks.
Who cares if they're looting food? People taking stuff without paying is the point of aid, and if that means the stuff isn't getting to its eventual destination it just means you need to send more stuff. Hamas having an overflowing stockpile of food isn't a security threat unless you're intentionally using starvation as a weapon.
This is very naive. What if it's not the starving people doing the looting? It's Hamas or whoever had the guns, and then they get to charge the starving people whatever they have for the food they took. The reason to prevent looting is to make sure the food actually makes it to the people who need it
Then keep jamming food into Gaza until Hamas has filled its caches and has no more space. Hamas having too much food isn't a threat and slowing down imports doesn't make more food somehow reach the people who need it. Food is only potentially valuable because people are starving, flood the market with food and you both don't have starving people and don't have an income stream for looters.
This "what if people who don't need it get it" anti-welfare mindset is stupid in general, but particularly ghoulish when you're talking about food for starving people. Food isn't a costly or limited resource, we can very much waste a little money on food that isn't precisely targeted to the most desperate to alleviate a humanitarian crisis of our own making.