120
submitted 8 months ago by TehBamski@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 0 points 8 months ago

Asteroid mining is incompatible with current capitalism. Say you harvest an asteroid with 100,000 of platinum in it. You in theory now have trollions of dollars in platinum for the $40 billion you spent harvesting the asteroid, only you have now quadrupled the amount of platinum in the economy, crayering the price and totally ruining your company. It's obviously a net good for humanity as a scarce resource is now abundant, but it is bad for capitalism because the ones who finaced the work are the biggest loser.

[-] Saigonauticon@voltage.vn 5 points 8 months ago

No you've got it backward. The mining is a cover. You look for celestial bodies that require only a small delta-v to redirect to a collision event.

It's a proper hostage situation, once you've got the infrastructure to replicate it more cheaply than people can defend against it.

[-] TehBamski@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

This would be a really cool idea for a novel or mini-series IMO.

[-] Saigonauticon@voltage.vn 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Oh yeah. I'd consult on that for sure. Tricking Silicon Valley to invest in something that then holds Earth hostage instead. Fun plot.

...although I bet they'd still invest if you just told them. As long as the financials work.

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

I did some googling and math. Global platinum market is 8 million oz a year. Current spot price is ~$900. That's $7T per year. They would have a monopoly and be able to shut down all mines by undercutting the price selling at say $800/oz. If it cost $40 Billion to mine the asteroid, that means it would take 7 years to pay back the cost.

7 year payback is short for businesses. Commercial Solar is installed despite having a 10 year payback.

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

I think if mining economy worked like that, Saudi Arabia would have gone bankrupt by cratering the price of oil.

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 1 points 8 months ago

Oil jas constant demand and the Saudis have so much of it that it costs them very little to drill for it and store it. And digging a new well doesn't immediately flood the market with 4x the annual production of oil.

I'm not arguing against asteroid mining. I am saying that it is fundamentally impossible under our current capitalist system. That's why there has been zero advances in the concept in iver a decade.

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

They don't have to sell all the platinum immediately. Just like DeBeers has mountains of diamonds they keep locked up in warehouses to keep the price controlled.

this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2024
120 points (96.9% liked)

Asklemmy

43965 readers
1332 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS