152
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by InevitableSwing@hexbear.net to c/earth@hexbear.net

I looked for the source - I couldn't find it.

---

Edit: SkingradGuard found it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It's less than 2000 records. If they had them all in one place that's only like a few weeks of data entry at worst

If they had to go out and find multiple data points per year though...

[-] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 months ago

Maybe, but something tells me they weren’t just recording cherry blossom dates. I just have a super hard time believing they didn’t record a bunch of stuff throughout the year, cherry blossom date being but one of them.

But maybe I’m wrong :)

[-] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Oh yeah, if they were entering data for tons of things each year and not just turning directly to the cherry blossom page that's a lot.

I live in Asheville and know tons of people who work at the NOAA offices here and that dataset alone is like 4 underground warehouses of weather data just from the past 200 years. Can't imagine something like that for 1200 years of records.

My job is also doing a lot of as built data entry for telecom networks though, so I'm used to hundreds of thousands of data points and that skewes my judgement.

this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2024
152 points (100.0% liked)

earth

12817 readers
12 users here now

The world’s #1 planet!

A community for the discussion of the environment, climate change, ecology, sustainability, nature, and pictures of cute wild animals.

Socialism is the only path out of the global ecological crisis.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS