197
submitted 8 months ago by tet@lemm.ee to c/linux@lemmy.ml

How does it stack up against traditional package management and others like AUR and Nix?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jkozaka@lemm.ee 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

While I don't think flatpak shouldn't replace traditional packages, I still like it.

Flatpak apps just work most of the time, they work without issues and are often very up to date. The sandboxing does have benefits because no apps interfere with it, the problem is that it doesn't work super well with other apps, sometimes the theming is off, and it doesn't work well with other apps, installing apps takes much longer, and it isn't as easily started from the command line.

Edit: typo

[-] neidu2@feddit.nl 6 points 8 months ago

In my opinion, with a debian style distro as the example, apt-get should be used for syatemwide stuff. Individual users can go for flatpak.

this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2024
197 points (94.6% liked)

Linux

48080 readers
770 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS