489
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NevermindNoMind@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago

Republican media has convinced their viewers that Biden is basically constantly confused and just slackjawed and drooling constantly. They set expectations for him so low, when reality didn't bare out their caracicture they had to pivot. I think the implication they are going for is Biden was dosed with something to make him seem coherent, basically the weekend at Bernie's president. Dumb, but so are Fox News viewers, so I'm sure it'll go over just fine with them.

That said, it did seem like Biden was yelling a lot. The few moments where he slowed down to talk about some somber topic came as a relief to me. To put a metric to it, I saw in Politico that the written version of his speech contained 80 more explanation marks than last year's speech.

[-] Wrench@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

Their viewers aren't watching the raw state of the address. They're watching the sound bites, so the conservative media can sell it whatever way they want

[-] Emerald@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

I was watching it on C-Span and they said the previous SOTU speech by him had 0 exclamation marks

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Well, what did you expect him to do when the other side is yelling stupidities all the time? When did a presidential debater had to tell the other side "will you shut up, man?" and call him "this clown"? When they run out of patience when trying to play by the rules, and the other side doesn't.

Then, you see that a segment of the population is still sleepwalking into fascism. Not some "maybe" danger, actual danger (the contender tried to keep power by force, and yet he's the main contender?!) Venezuela went through this. Look up the Hugo Chavez story.

The first two minutes of the speech was practically him saying "WAKE UP, AMERICA!! See what's happening!"

It was about time.

The other side is a constant "NU-UH! NO U!!!" noise, and you felt "relieved" when Biden was speaking calmly?

I say, he should have used 80 more exclamation marks.

[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago

(Autocorrect turned your exclamation into explanation)

this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2024
489 points (96.2% liked)

politics

19144 readers
1551 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS