197
submitted 6 months ago by tet@lemm.ee to c/linux@lemmy.ml

How does it stack up against traditional package management and others like AUR and Nix?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Shareni@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago

How up-to-date are the packages, compared to Flatpaks?

Same or more up to date. It's up there with arch, but some packages are purposely separated. For example the go package is 1.21.7, but there's also a go_1_22 package that's 1.22.1. I'm guessing they're waiting for it to be fully tested, while arch replaced it immediately.

Sadly, the Nix version was almost a year old and also not great.

check here , set the channel to unstable to see the freshest packages

I think Nix packages have similar benefits as immutable distros.

Nix as an external pm has most of the benefits, but almost none of the downsides. It creates an immutable package store, but doesn't cause FHS compliance related issues.

this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2024
197 points (94.6% liked)

Linux

47355 readers
1278 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS