159
submitted 1 year ago by filoria@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

What an insane take.

  1. Consenting to sex is NOT consenting to pregnancy

  2. Consenting to pregnancy does NOT mean consent cannot be revoked

  3. No person has the right to use another person's body without their consent

Anyone calling themselves a libertarian should have these 3 points tattooed on their forehead.

[-] CableMonster@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago

If the union of sperm and egg is a person, and if that person has the right to bodily autonomy, then yes having sex is consenting to making a person with the right to protection. and you cant kill them.

[-] aalvare2@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Putting aside that your first “if” statement is only believed by religious extremists, if sex is consenting to making a person, then does that mean that those who are raped are also “consenting”?

[-] CableMonster@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago

Rape is not consent to sex, and its a completely different discussion.

this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
159 points (94.4% liked)

World News

35427 readers
574 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS