638

Israeli rabbi says ‘kill everyone in Gaza, including babies’ (thecradle.co)

submitted 8 months ago by CaractacusPotts@lemmy.ca to c/world@lemmy.world

258 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] CaractacusPotts@lemmy.ca 8 points 8 months ago

Israel’s formal position is not the elimination of Palestinian Arabs.

The UN has found credible evidence to the contrary

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/6/7/un-report-finds-israeli-occupation-root-cause-of-conflict

Zionism was from the very beginning a settler colonial enterprise. Yes genocidal attitudes towards Jews may have been used to promote the idea, but the end goal was always possession of land.

In its initial stage, Zionism was conceived by its pioneers as a movement wholly depending on mechanical factors: there is a country which happens to be called Palestine, a country without a people, and, on the other hand, there exists the Jewish people, and it has no country. What else is necessary, then, than to fit the gem into the ring, to unite this people with this country? The owners of the country [the Turks] must, therefore, be persuaded and convinced that this marriage is advantageous, not only for the [Jewish] people and for the country, but also for themselves.

https://digitalprojects.palestine-studies.org/resources/special-focus/zionist-settler-colonialism

[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 months ago

It's worth noting that the ones who rejected that mandatory Palestine map were the Arab Palestinians.

[-] CaractacusPotts@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago

If it's worth noting, you should cite sources.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 2 points 8 months ago

I've come to hate people asking for sources in the interwebs. If you ask me for the sources for Gleiwitz or Mainila, or anything else, it'll be as hard to find as on this subject.

People who are ready to invest their time in writing a short comment may not be ready to do that for finding sources for you. And that's valid and doesn't mean you've won an argument or something. Arguments can't be won or lost anyway.

And people who are really ready to find sources are mostly not the good ones, it's, say, genocide denialist Turks\Azeris and the sources they link are trash or don't support what they say.

So you are making it seem that the other side has no sources when they may have and not giving sources seem worse than giving garbage sources.

And on your question - the Wikipedia article has some sources which seem fine.

[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

For me, it's more kind of shocking that so many people feel like they can confidently comment on these events without basic knowledge of the very well known history surrounding them. Someone who has such large gaps in their knowledge probably isn't worth debating further, and simply highlighting those gaps should provide pretty good view to anyone else reading this conversation about what level they are operating on.

This is especially notable when you see accounts which literally do nothing besides comment on this conflict.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 0 points 8 months ago

I think you are putting unneeded conditions where there should be only one - whether you want to participate for your amusement.

Arguments do not expose truth. Arguments are not won or lost. If the arguing sides are trying to impose some position, to win some fight, then the argument is garbage.

Nothing shocking here either. They do what they want with their time.

[-] CaractacusPotts@lemmy.ca -1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Flaky... understood.

this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2024

638 points (92.5% liked)

World News

39161 readers

1527 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.