454
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] gaael@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

In France, we've had electric trains since the 60s, diesel train were phased out except for some lines with exceptional difficulty.
We also had electric streetcars in big, medium and small cities before ww2, they were taken out to make more place for... ICE cars.

Public transportation tech has been ready for a long long time. Cars are the worst way of transportation, saying tech was not ready because electric cars were "garbage" does not make a lot of sense.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 5 points 8 months ago

France also had most of its grid on nuclear power decades ago.

[-] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee -1 points 8 months ago

And as far as I know. They’ve run it successfully.

I want more nuclear power but everyone is afraid we will have a Chernobyl event. Nuclear power is highly regulated and I’m OK with that. I wouldn’t mind even more regulations to keep it safe.

The one issue we refuse to solve is long term storage

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 5 points 8 months ago

From what I've read, and it's been a while), engineers plan for safety, but project managers and other company execs convince clients to take "cost-effective" corner cuts, leading to disaster. Looking at companies like Duke, Fluor, Dominion.

[-] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 0 points 8 months ago

At the end of the day, you have to produce a product that is safe but cost effective. Nobody wants to pay 1per kWh for a safety level that is unmeasurable.

That is why utilities are regulated since they are monopolies. I feel the regulations need to be cleaned up but that’s the goal.

I think fines should be taken from executive pay. Bonuses should also be set to safety and environmental factors.

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

My point is that it's not cost effective, in human, environmental damages, but the cost of "clean up" alone negates any savings fun* not doing it right from the jump.

Autocorrect but leaving it.

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 3 points 8 months ago

Yes, in the USA, Goodyear Tires and GM (I believe they were the ones leading the initiative) lobbied against trollies and buses and other public transit so they could make more money seeking their products

[-] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee -4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

France is not the United States.

Now you could say cars created the spread in the United States but we are a spread out nation.

Our train system is subpar and the government won’t invest the money to improve it.

Most Americans won’t or can’t give up their cars.

https://www.wanderingfrance.com/blog/articles/182/how-big-is-france

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Think of all the government regulations, the subsidies, the trillions of dollars , that went toward making cars such a compelling choice. Surely some of that could have been used for transit, making that a very different decision all along.

We all helped cement cars as the transportation of choice, both by investments and action, and lack of action, partly in response to industry lobbying. We would be in a very different place now, if someone had stepped back to look at the bigger picture

this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2024
454 points (98.1% liked)

World News

39153 readers
1782 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS