574
submitted 2 years ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Exclusive: most renters surveyed by Harris Poll say the areas they live in have become so unaffordable they are ‘barely livable’

The poll, conducted by the Harris Poll Thought Leadership and Future Practice, asked survey takers to identify themselves as renters or homeowners, along with other demographic information. Those polled were asked their opinion on home ownership in the United States. For many, especially renters, the outlook is bleak.

Though the vast majority of renters polled said they want to own a home in the future, 61% said they are worried they will never be able to. A similar percentage believe no matter how hard they work, they’ll never be able to afford a home.

“When you think about Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, and housing is right at that foundational level of security, the implications on consumer psyche when things feel so unaffordable is something that will impact everyone,” said Libby Rodney, chief strategy officer at Harris Poll. The American dream of owning a home “is looking more like a daydream for renters”.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Checking Zillow for my city, it's $500k minimum for a 2br an hour and a half away by car. That would also put me in the middle of a Republican area as a queer immigrant.

The "buy a house in the middle of nowhere" mentality doesn't take into account the risks and depression associated with living somewhere red as a minority.

[-] pixxelkick@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The “buy a house in the middle of nowhere” mentality doesn’t take into account the risks and depression associated with living somewhere red as a minority.

This is genuinely one of the first counterpoint I've seen that I have to say is actually super valid.

I completely agree on this, it's a big factor to consider.

However, I will note often you see a sort of split where you have 2-3 suburbs/towns near a big city, and one of them goes blue abd the other goes red, and you can see a bit of polarizing that happens as folks switch between the two to polarize away from each other.

In my area, one smaller town just switch all it's bathrooms to gender neutral bathrooms in the public office, the other one banned rainbow flags from being flown.

So if it's a condolence, at least that sometimes happens.

I expect it depends how left/right the province/state as a whole leans. I expect this phemonina stops happening in places like texas :(

As an example, in my area the "magic sauce" for why it was so much more affordable is the same fact it's heavily populated by imfolks from India and Africa. I'd say about half the people in this corner of the city or so, and I live in a much more right leaning province (Alberta, which is the florida of canada now)

So I expect a lot of... right leaning folks hate the idea of being neighbour's with folks in this neighborhood.

Oh well, cheaper house for me, and I love my community.

I wonder to what extent some amount of "can't afford homes" culture is influenced by racists who don't count any homes that run the "risk" of having to live next door to someone who isn't white.

I partially just assume people that "dont count" affordable homes because "I don't wanna live there" are just racist at this point, or, minorities trying to avoid racists.

this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
574 points (98.3% liked)

News

35986 readers
796 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS