this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
29 points (89.2% liked)
Cars - For Car Enthusiasts
3916 readers
51 users here now
About Community
c/Cars is the largest automotive enthusiast community on Lemmy and the fediverse. We're your central hub for vehicle-related discussion, industry news, reviews, projects, DIY guides, advice, stories, and more.
Rules
- Stay respectful to the community, hold civil discussions, even when others hold opinions that may differ from yours.
- This is not an NSFW community, and any such content will not be tolerated.
- Policy, not politics! Policy discussions revolve around the concept; political discussions revolve around the individual, party, association, etc. We only allow POLICY discussions and political discussions should go to c/politics.
- Must be related to cars, anything that does not have connection to cars will be considered spam/irrelevant and is subject to removal.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
The car weighs very little and is very aerodynamic. Diesel fuel has higher energy density than gasoline that came in these cars. And these little diesels are pretty efficient especially when forced induction is added, but they’re still relatively dirty and I don’t know what kind of emissions controls the builder added (likely none, from the sound description).
The late 90s was short of a peak of light weight and aerodynamics. Often at the cost of safety to some extent. The insight was one of the lightest and slipperiest. But it had a heavy battery pack (now removed) that was used as a power booster for the ICE. EPA was 53mpg which was good for the time.
This guy basically built a DIY VW XL1. Except he did it with ~~30%~~ 100cc less displacement and no restrictions on emissions.
The XL1 got 240mpg for reference, 73 should be way to get and he could probably do way better with a tank of engineers and things like start/stop that the VW team had.
Edit: I was thinking the VW was a 1 liter but it’s 800cc.