197
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by corb3t@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.ml

Not a good look for Mastodon - what can be done to automate the removal of CSAM?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] fubo@lemmy.world 173 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

https://stacks.stanford.edu/file/druid:vb515nd6874/20230724-fediverse-csam-report.pdf

I'd suggest that anyone who cares about the issue take the time to read the actual report, not just drama-oriented news articles about it.

[-] Dee@lemmy.world 61 points 1 year ago

So if I'm understanding right, based on their recommendations this will all be addressed as more moderation and QOL tools are introduced as we move further down the development roadmap?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] duncesplayed@lemmy.one 51 points 1 year ago

If I can try to summarize the main findings:

  1. Computer-generated (e.g.., Stable Diffusion) child porn is not criminalized in Japan, and so many Japanese Mastodon servers don't remove it
  2. Porn involving real children is removed, but not immediately, as it depends on instance admins to catch it, and they have other things to do. Also, when an account is banned, the Mastodon server software is not sending out a "delete" for all of their posted material (which would signal other instances to delete it)

Problem #2 can hopefully be improved with better tooling. I don't know what you do about problem #1, though.

[-] fubo@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

One option would be to decide that the underlying point of removing real CSAM is to avoid victimizing real children; and that computer-generated images are no more relevant to this goal than Harry/Draco slash fiction is.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

Such a signal exists in the ActivityPub protocol, so I wonder why it's not being used.

[-] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

I don't know what you do about problem #1, though.

Well the simple answer is that it doesn't have to be illegal to remove it.

The legal question is a lot harder, considering AI image generation has reached levels that are almost indistinguishable from reality.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In which case, admins should err on the side of caution and remove something that might be illegal.

I personally would prefer to have nothing remotely close to CSAM, but as long as children aren't being harmed in any conceivable way, I don't think it would be illegal to post art containing children. But communities should absolutely manage things however they think is best for their community.

In other words, I don't think #1 is a problem at all, imo things should only be illegal if there's a clear victim.

[-] mindbleach@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

4.1 Illustrated and Computer-Generated CSAM

Stopped reading.

Child abuse laws "exclude anime" for the same reason animal cruelty laws "exclude lettuce." Drawings are not children.

Drawings are not real.

Half the goddamn point of saying CSAM instead of CP is to make clear that Bart Simpson doesn't count. Bart Simpson is not real. It is fundamentally impossible to violate Bart Simpson's rights, because he doesn't fucking exist. There is nothing to protect him from. He cannot be harmed. He is imaginary.

This cannot be a controversial statement. Anyone who can't distinguish fiction from real life has brain problems.

You can't rape someone in MS Paint. Songs about murder don't leave a body. If you write about robbing Fort Knox, the gold is still there. We're not about to arrest Mads Mikkelsen for eating people. It did not happen. It was not real.

If you still want to get mad at people for jerking off to the wrong fantasies, that is an entirely different problem from photographs of child rape.

[-] wmassingham@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

You should keep reading then, because they cover that later.

[-] mindbleach@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

What does that even mean?

There's nothing to "cover." They're talking about illustrations of bad things, alongside actual photographic evidence of actual bad things actually happening. Nothing can excuse that.

No shit they are also discussing actual CSAM alongside... drawings. That is the problem. That's what they did wrong.

[-] DrQuint@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Oh, wait, Japanese in the other comment, now I get it. This conversation is a about AI Loli porn.

Pfft, of course, that's why no one is saying the words they mean, because it suddenly becomes much harder to take the stance since hatred towards Loli Porn is not universal.

I mean, I think it's disgusting, but I don't think it should be illegal. I feel the same way about cigarettes, 2 girls 1 cup, and profane language. It's absolutely not for me, but that shouldn't make it illegal.

As long as there's no victim, knock yourself out with whatever disgusting, weird stuff you're into.

[-] balls_expert@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Okay, thanks for the clarification

Everyone except you still very much includes drawn & AI pornographic depictions of children within the basket of problematic content that should get filtered out of federated instances so thank you very much but I'm not sure your point changed anything.

[-] priapus@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

They are not saying it shouldn't be defederated, they are saying reporting this to authorities is pointless and that considering CSAM is harmful.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (52 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
197 points (79.4% liked)

Technology

34987 readers
398 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS