"Everyone is NOT equally vulnerable to propaganda" a part 2 to another Hexbear's post (redsails.org)

submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by Lemmygradwontallowme@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

27 comments fedilink hide all child comments

So I've heard of a previous post from which reminded me of this article from Red Sails...

So far, only a few people have mentioned Red Sails in that previous post, though with a different, but relevant article, but none have mentioned there its most famous article "Masses, Elites, and Rebels"

(Note: this has been posted a bunch of times on this community, you better read it, it's a short one)

I will let a few excerpts speak for themselves

“Brainwashing” as a political theory breaks society down into three mutually-exclusive camps: 1) a group of elite manipulators, 2) vast masses under their control, 3) a rebellious group of enlightened critics (to which the person launching the accusation of “brainwashing” implicitly always belongs, since they are neither unaware of it nor abetting it). An unstated premise of this political theory is that what determines which of these camps any individual belongs to is a mixture of intellectual enlightenment and moral purity.

{...}

I am going to argue that this narrative is nonsense. It tries to pass off as universal and eternal something that in reality is particular and ephemeral. In short: Westerners aren’t helpless innocents whose minds are injected with atrocity propaganda, science fiction-style; they’re generally smug bourgeois proletarians who intelligently seek out as much racist propaganda as they can get their hands on.

{...}

The prevailing populist narrative grants the People (of the West) moral innocence by attributing to them utter stupidity and naivety; I invert the equation and demand a Marxist narrative instead: Westerners are willingly complicit in crimes because they instinctively and correctly understand that they benefit as a class (as a global bourgeois proletariat) from the exploitation enabled by their military and their propaganda — organs of coercion and consent. [6] We’re not as stupid as we’re made out to be. This means that we can be reasoned with, that there is a way out.

Admittedly I am smuglord about this....

But pls, make this a primer on the side bar of this comm, many ppl need to see this

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 31 points 8 months ago

I think people vastly underestimate how impactful formal education is in ideological formation. People don't believe in a bunch of anti-communist bullshit due to anti-communist movies or "material conditions" or some vague sense of propaganda. People believe in anti-communist bullshit because they were taught anti-communist bullshit by anti-communist teachers using anti-communist curriculums set by anti-communist administrations. If you're taught anti-communist bullshit during school and hear more anti-communist bullshit on Sundays from an anti-communist preacher, of course you're going to be primed to believe in any anti-communist lie.

What everyone was missing is that it requires conscious effort by the state to teach anti-communism to its inhabitants. The state is not going to coast on its inhabitants materially benefiting from unequal exchange or rely on a bunch of movies made by reactionary directors. No, the anti-communism is going to be force fed, and anyone who doesn't toe the anti-communism line, be it student or teacher, will be punished and made an example of. Of course, while the anti-communism is a very conscious effort, the fact that it's a conscious effort is a tacit admittance that the state has to be ruthless in its ideological formation and any lapse of effort on part of the state or a greater-than-anticipated degree of ideological resistance on part of the student means an ideological crack that the person can escape from.

Or in more simple terms:

if your teachers sucked at peddling anti-communist bullshit, whether it's because they're secret comrades or they're just incompetent, you're probably less primed towards believing in anti-communist bullshit.
if you, for whatever reason (marginalized member in a school system completely hostile to your marginalized identity), put less faith in the school system relative to your peers, you're probably going to either completely check out mentally or be more skeptical of what gets taught there.

This explains why some people can resist their programming while other people act like NPCs. You don't have to be smart^TM^ in order to be resistant against propaganda. Your teachers might just have been shitty propagandists. Or your school might have been full of ableist assholes who shit on you for being autistic. Or your immediate family is poor who gets treated like shit by your rich extended family. Or you had a cryptocommunist teacher who made you read Howard Zinn's A People's History of the United States. The list goes on and on.

[-] showmustgo@hexbear.net 31 points 8 months ago

And so we have to set up a special classroom for the poor, to teach the poor some bloody lessons from the past—all the crimes committed by the violent rebels, the followers of Marx. Shove the lessons of history down their throats. History, history. The crimes. The oppression. The famines. The disasters. Teach the poor that they must never try to seize power for themselves, because the rule of the poor will always be incompetent, and it will always be cruel. The poor are bloodthirsty. Uneducated. They don't have the skills. For their own sake, it must never happen. And they must understand that the dreamers, the idealists, the ones who say that they love the poor, will all become vicious killers in the end, and the ones who claim they can create something better will always end up by creating something worse. The poor must understand these essential lessons, chapters from history. And if they don't understand them, they must all be taken out and shot. Inattention or lack of comprehension cannot be allowed.

The Fever, Wallace Shawn

[-] WaterBowlSlime@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 8 months ago

This quote convinced me to read the play and damn, it's fucking incredible. I've seen the part about commodity fetishism get quoted and I think this part just before your quote deserves attention too:

And so in our frozen world, our silent world, we have to talk to the poor. Talk, listen, clarify, explain. They want things to be different. They want change. And so we say, Yes. Change. But not violent change. Not theft, not revolt, no revenge. Instead, listen to the idea of gradual change. Change that will help you, but that won't hurt us. Morality. Law. Gradual change. We explain it all: a two-sided contract: we'll give you things, many things, but in exchange you must accept that you don't have the right just to take what you want. We're going to give you wonderful things. Sit down, wait, don't try to grab— The most important thing is patience, waiting. We're going to give you much much more than you're getting now, but there are certain things that must happen first—these are the things for which we must wait. First, we have to make more than we gave to grow more, so more will be available for us to give. Otherwise, if we give you more, we'll have less. When we make more and we grow more, we can all have more—some of the increase can go to you. But the other thing is, once there is more, we have to make sure that morality prevails. Morality is the key. Last year, we made more and we grew more, but we didn't give you more. All of the increase was kept for ourselves. That was wrong. The same thing happened the year before, and the year before that. We have to convince everyone to accept morality and next year give some of the increase to you.

Here's a link if anyone wants to read the whole thing