294
submitted 7 months ago by downpunxx@fedia.io to c/politics@lemmy.world

Donald Trump has so far been unable to obtain a bond that would allow him to appeal a $454 million judgment against him in a New York civil fraud case without posting the full amount himself, his lawyers said on Monday.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 103 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Wait it says “without posting it himself”.

Then it says it’s an “impossible amount”.

BuT He’S A bIlliONaiRE!!!

[-] zenharbinger@lemmy.world 32 points 7 months ago

He has no cash, it's all tied up in real estate. He would have to sell to get the bond money.

Probably could get a 'donor' to purchase though.

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 64 points 7 months ago

If he really had money and paid his debts any bond issuer who could afford it would have done it by now.

Hard to set up the value of collateral when his crime is inflating th worth of his assets.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 41 points 7 months ago

It's not all tied up in real estate. Recall he has a lot of the equity in Truth Social, which he is trying to sell at an inflated price to DWAC. He is just as much of an internet influencer these days as a real estate investor.

But I think it is telling that a key point of the trial was that he overinflated the value of his assets, and now that he has to put up cash, all of a sudden we find that he can't put up enough collateral, because banks are no longer taking his word on those valuations.

[-] zenharbinger@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

Ok, better put, it's non-liquid. It's all tied up in over inflated investments. 😀

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 33 points 7 months ago

What's really unfortunate for him is that he claimed in depositions that he had $400 million cash on hand. So either he does have the cash or he committed perjury.

[-] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 17 points 7 months ago

Yes, except laws are for people like you and I.

[-] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Would be great to see the RNC put their money on this!!

Edit /s

[-] rezifon@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago

The RNC only had $8.7 million on January 31st of this year. They're $445 million dollars short of the amount that Trump needs. (Reference)

[-] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 10 points 7 months ago

I still think it's a great idea for them to use all thier money for this lol

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago

If it was a real substance in real estate, it should be easy to borrow the money he needs. So either his real estate is already mortgaged to the hilt, so he can't add anymore on top, or they simply don't trust the evaluations any more.

I really hope they start selling off Trumps stuff starting next week. In a fire sale, cents for the dollar.

[-] obviouspornalt@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 7 months ago

I'm betting it's both over leveraged and no one will lend to him.

[-] Furedadmins@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

And lendors think he will lose and have to actually pay.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

He has no cash, it's all tied up in real estate. He would have to sell to get the bond money.

Welp, he'd better get busy selling it, then! Especially since even if he doesn't appeal he's got to fork it over anyway to pay the judgement, LOL.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 6 points 7 months ago

Don't worry, the State of NY will do that part for him.

[-] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

I am SO looking forward to that.

[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 3 points 7 months ago

He doesn't have to liquidate it now. He can put it up as collateral against a loan.

The liquidation will happen when his appeal is denied, and the loan is called in.

load more comments (8 replies)
this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2024
294 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19089 readers
2164 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS