1858
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
1858 points (98.8% liked)
Fediverse
28468 readers
200 users here now
A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).
If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!
Rules
- Posts must be on topic.
- Be respectful of others.
- Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
- Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.
Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
believe it or not its more likely they straight up ripped off U+1D54F MATHEMATICAL DOUBLE-STRUCK CAPITAL X:
๐
absolutely no creativity. at least threads drew the ring in @ clockwise instead of the usual anticlockwise
Saw this on Mastodon:
Important sets:
โ the complex numbers
โ the natural numbers
โ the rational numbers
โ the real numbers
๐ the set of fascists wannabes
โค the integers
My favorite comment about this from Mastodon: "X is just a sans serif swastika".
I would argue that โค would also be the set of Russian fascist wannabes.
Imagine a billionaire approving that "logo" despite how uncreative it is. Like get a better graphic designer I guess?
only difference between billionaires and normal people is that billionaires have a lot of money. best not to assume they have above-average logo appreciation skills. although they could hire some good advisors i suppose
yeah but then they'd be spending money to be told they might not be 100% right and perfect 100% of the time, and that's just a waste of money
Billionaires wouldn't care if they're wasting money
if that was true then maybe the stingy fuckers would tip wait staff
Why did they do my boy \mathds{X} like that?
Now nobody will use him for an algebraic ring :(