283
Don't run out of memory
(lemmy.dbzer0.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2024
283 points (98.3% liked)
linuxmemes
21281 readers
16 users here now
Hint: :q!
Sister communities:
- LemmyMemes: Memes
- LemmyShitpost: Anything and everything goes.
- RISA: Star Trek memes and shitposts
Community rules (click to expand)
1. Follow the site-wide rules
- Instance-wide TOS: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/
- Lemmy code of conduct: https://join-lemmy.org/docs/code_of_conduct.html
2. Be civil
- Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
- Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
- Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
- Bigotry will not be tolerated.
- These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
3. Post Linux-related content
- Including Unix and BSD.
- Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of
sudoin Windows. - No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
4. No recent reposts
- Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
Please report posts and comments that break these rules!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I liked the server I set up the other day. 512 gigs of ram, 1 gig swap.
We're using maybe 100gigs currently.
Why even bother having swap at that point?
because swap does other things than "extending" your physical ram
I think the question is: if a person is going to make such a tiny swap, why even use swap?
Such a small swap is unlikely to save a system from memory problems and it's does not seem likely to make a noticeable difference in performance when it's only able to swap out small amounts of memory.
Why wouldn't one just put in larger ZRAM or a larger Swap with a reduced swapiness?
If I have a raspberry pi with 1 GB ram, I don't think a 2 MB swap is worth bothering with.
Swap is not intended to save a system from memory problems. And absolutely not fit for that purpose.
And if you are using that memory, it will make a noticeable difference in performance.
But for it to have any impact at all, you need the default (high) swapiness. If you reduce it, that partition will become useless.
Anyway, I don't recommend you put any swap at your PI's SD card.
I wouldn't put swap on an SD card, no. Even if it had an NVME, it seems like putting up at least a double-digit percent would be more effective than 1%.
Also, since 6.1, swap has been a lot better, with MGLRU. ChromeOS gets away with paltry amounts of RAM due to swapping. So classic overcommitting seems fine as long as you don't run into situations where more RAM is active at once than is available by hardware.
4 GB are 4 GB, it doesn't matter how much memory you have at total.
The only usage of swap where you should even look at your RAM size is for on-disk sleeping. And most people don't do this anymore.
Because it's not what what you think it is and doesn't do what you think it does. https://chrisdown.name/2018/01/02/in-defence-of-swap.html
While the rest of that post matches my understanding of swap (I still think 1GB is next to useless in this case), that summarized point perplexes me.
What non-special file(s) does the kernel write to and read from, and how does it know how much space to use?