1774
submitted 1 year ago by narwhal@lemmy.ml to c/firefox@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bappity@lemmy.world 61 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

this is the most batshit insane proposal... I hope nobody supports it

[-] sci@feddit.nl 32 points 1 year ago

if google microsoft and apple support it, that already covers over 90% of the market

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

Google alone is enough. Biggest browser, search engine, advertiser, OS and some of the biggest sites on the web all owned by them.

[-] HelloHotel@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

If they steamroll this thru, youll have an amazing anti trust case

[-] AceSLS@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 year ago

Don't worry, people will certainly make bypasses for that shit

[-] Nindelofocho@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

that’s exactly what people said with manifest V3 then all the sudden they were getting strikes on youtube for having their ad blocker on

[-] AceSLS@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 1 year ago

And how well did that work out? I personally haven't gotten any strike on youtube, using uBlock/mpv on PC, Youtube Revanced on mobile and SmartTube for TV since forever

Also there's this https://invidious.io/. So yeah, it's just the classic cat & mouse game that has been going on for ever since software added drm

[-] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.one 11 points 1 year ago

Google has already lashed out at Invidious though, and they'll keep trying

I agree that in most cases people can find workarounds, but I don't think we should take these things for granted

[-] AceSLS@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago

Google has no ground to stand on against Invidious

They may harass them but it'll be veeery difficult to chase down all instances

[-] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.one 7 points 1 year ago

Oh, I'm well aware of that, but I also have little faith in the justice system to recognize this

In any case, it seems like a warning shot from Google and an interest in taking down sites like Invidious

I'm not trying to spread doubt, but I also think complacency is dangerous, especially given the history of corporate giants like Google

[-] HelloHotel@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Steamrolling this change Forcing people to have an incredably invasive change to force you to use chrome or use googled android, or use googled chromebooks.

its incredably bright lines it would destablize trust in anything that agrees with it. If the amrican court doesnt prosecute. It will eather show the ignorance/lies in others or destablize amarican trust in the law.

[-] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago

We're talking about a public and justice system that mostly agreed the Patriot Act was a good idea and that ICE protects us from terrorism

Anyone who hasn't already lost trust America and our law has been sleeping for decades

[-] Nindelofocho@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It’s probably a slow roll out for exact cases like this one to ease the backlash. I havent gotten any notice like such either but Im on Firefox. I do fully support invidious though

this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
1774 points (99.2% liked)

Firefox

17302 readers
26 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS