527
submitted 8 months ago by Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

While Eva Burch spoke on the Senate floor about her planned abortion, almost all of her GOP colleagues found something else to do

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] aidan@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

But that doesn't really make sense, there is no federal law about abortion, the constitution protects gun ownership.ax

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 8 months ago

yeah, that's my point.

There was a federal law about abortion. We dont have it anymore.

[-] aidan@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Except it was written nowhere near as explicitly.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago

idk man it was pretty explicit, considering the fact that the second it was removed, legislation went into place in order to ban it on a state level. Seems pretty explicit to me.

[-] aidan@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Wdym? The SCOTUS ruling was explicit, the constitution never mentioned it though.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago

yeah, idk if you noticed, but generally, theres this pretty cool thing about the US government where its really fucking bloated, and so anything can come from anywhere. It's not like amendments are set in stone either. I mean slavery would be a thing still otherwise, and women wouldn't have rights.

[-] aidan@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah no but amendments have to be explicitly changed.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago
[-] aidan@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago
[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago

yup. What makes you think any part of the constitution is any different? Shit wasn't written by god and this isnt the catholic church.

[-] aidan@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Because once the state ignores the law binding it, the people might as well too. The bill of rights is the protections of the people.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago

well see thats the thing, you don't ignore it, you just make it not apply anymore.

[-] aidan@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Wdym? Like pass an amendment? Yeah that's an option just nobody's really pushing for that

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago

yeah exactly, all it takes is people pushing for it. That's it.

[-] aidan@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago
[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago

literally everything the government does is difficult.

[-] aidan@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago
[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago

hence the fact that it has multiple branches, that all do different things

[-] MJKee9@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Technically, both gun ownership rights and abortion rights were based on supreme Court interpretation of the 2nd and 14th amendments (respectively). Given the reversal of the right to abortion under the 14th amendment, an argument could be made that a similar reversal is due for the 2nd amendment as well. The 2nd amendment could simply be interpreted to mean that gun ownership is only a right as part of a "well regulated militia.'. In my opinion, that is the plain meaning of the provision anyway, but I'm just a gun toting liberal that doesn't get sexually aroused or validated by the size of my firearm.

this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2024
527 points (97.5% liked)

News

23301 readers
1192 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS